BFGoodrich Touring im Test
The BFGoodrich Touring (often identified in user feedback as sharing architecture with Tigar, Kormoran, and Orium brands) receives highly polarized reviews regarding its performance. While some users praise its exceptional longevity and value, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling predictability.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
56%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 7 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The BFGoodrich Touring (often identified in user feedback as sharing architecture with Tigar, Kormoran, and Orium brands) receives highly polarized reviews regarding its performance. While some users praise its exceptional longevity and value, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling predictability.
Vorteile
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High value-to-cost ratio
- Satisfactory dry road handling for daily commuting
- Comfortable ride quality
Nachteile
- Poor wet-weather grip and traction
- Tendency for abrupt understeer in slippery conditions
- Dated performance characteristics compared to modern competitors
- Unpredictable handling on slick surfaces like drain covers
Gut zu wissen
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Kia Picanto reported high satisfaction with longevity, reaching over 90,000km.
- Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the Skoda Octavia noted that the tire's performance limitations become more apparent and concerning during spirited or varied weather driving.