Zum Inhalt springen
Sommerreifen Sommerreifen · Touring Aktualisiert Mai 2026

Blacklion Champoint BU66 im Test

The Blacklion Champoint BU66 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that frequently exceeds user expectations, often drawing favorable comparisons to premium brands like Pirelli and Continental. While the vast majority of users report excellent wet and dry grip, quiet operation, and impressive longevity, a small minority of users have experienced significant handling issues and safety concerns, suggesting potential inconsistency in quality or performance across different vehicle setups.

Relativer Score
84/100
Tests + Besitzer
Besitzerbewertungen
85/100
21 Bewertungen
Blacklion Champoint BU66
Bewertungen

Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich

Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.

Nach Besitzerbewertungen

85%
Würden wieder kaufen 92%
Trocken
Trocken gesamt
88%
Kurvenstabilität
89%
Traktion trocken
92%
Lenkansprechen
91%
Nass
Nass gesamt
84%
Traktion nass
90%
Komfort
Komfort gesamt
85%
Laufleistung
Laufleistung gesamt
81%
Handling
Handling gesamt
82%
Von Besitzern

Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht

Themen aus 21 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.

The Blacklion Champoint BU66 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that frequently exceeds user expectations, often drawing favorable comparisons to premium brands like Pirelli and Continental. While the vast majority of users report excellent wet and dry grip, quiet operation, and impressive longevity, a small minority of users have experienced significant handling issues and safety concerns, suggesting potential inconsistency in quality or performance across different vehicle setups.

Vorteile

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Low road noise levels
  • Good tread life and durability
  • Comfortable ride quality compared to run-flat alternatives

Nachteile

  • Inconsistent handling characteristics on certain vehicles
  • Reports of unpredictable behavior during aggressive acceleration in wet conditions
  • Potential for tracking or wandering issues on specific chassis
  • Polarizing experiences regarding safety and reliability

Gut zu wissen

  • Users replacing factory run-flat tires on performance sedans (e.g., BMW, Mercedes C43) reported significant improvements in ride comfort and grip.
  • Drivers of heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., Jaguar XF, Volvo XC70) noted that the tires handle weight and power well, though rear-wheel geometry can accelerate inner-edge wear.