Tests – · noch keine Besitzer 83 · 681 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 3 von 8 im 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test (gesamtplatzierung)
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
Direktvergleich
Aktualisiert
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A vs Falken Azenis FK510 — im Vergleich
Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Azenis FK510 führt, 76–73 Knapper Vorsprung
Ihre Größe angeben für genaue Treffer
/R
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 72 · 29 Tests Besitzer 82 · 478 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 5 von 10 im 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (gesamtplatzierung)
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
Kategorie für Kategorie
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
-
83
Trocken
Potenza RE050A +380Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 74 Tire Rack Besitzer 87 89 Tyre Reviews Besitzer 83 88 SimpleTire Besitzer 90 97 -
70
Nass
Azenis FK510 +1585Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 83 Tire Rack Besitzer 74 86 Tyre Reviews Besitzer 70 88 SimpleTire Besitzer 80 91 -
80
Schnee
Potenza RE050A +575Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 SimpleTire Besitzer 80 75 -
60
Komfort
Azenis FK510 +161Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 48 Tire Rack Besitzer 71 83 Tyre Reviews Besitzer 59 77 SimpleTire Besitzer 90 95 -
90
Geräusch
Potenza RE050A +1971Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 60 SimpleTire Besitzer 90 88 -
66
Laufleistung
Azenis FK510 +975Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Tire Rack Besitzer 62 77 Tyre Reviews Besitzer 66 71 SimpleTire Besitzer 80 80 -
72
Handling
Azenis FK510 +981Warum dieser Score
Quelle Potenza RE050A Azenis FK510 Tyre Reviews Besitzer 72 81 DriverReviews Besitzer 82 86
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 73 | 76 |
| Trocken | 83 | 80 |
| Nass | 70 | 85 |
| Schnee | 80 | 75 |
| Komfort | 60 | 61 |
| Geräusch | 90 | 71 |
| Laufleistung | 66 | 75 |
| Handling | 72 | 81 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore
73
/ 100
Potenza RE050A
76
/ 100
Azenis FK510
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Potenza RE050A | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 33% #3/8 · 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test | 20% #5/10 · 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +13,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Reifen A Potenza RE050A
Vorteile
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
- Precise steering response and sharp turn-in feedback
- Stiff sidewalls that enhance sporty handling and provide rim protection
Nachteile
- Harsh ride quality and stiff impact absorption, especially over rough roads and potholes
- Noticeable and escalating road noise as the tires wear
- Mediocre performance and reduced traction in cold temperatures or wintry conditions
Reifen B Azenis FK510
Vorteile
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Nachteile
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Reifen A
Gemischt
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is recognized as an older high-performance summer tire design that still delivers strong dry grip, handling, and cornering capabilities. While some users appreciate their longevity with proper maintenance, others note reduced wet and cold weather traction and point out that newer alternatives are available.
r/cars
·6 Upvotes ·2017-11-18
“The RE050A is an old design. Tirerack tested it all the way back in 2004 That isn't to say it's bad, it compared well to other tires in its class. Bridgestone also makes some really good tires (Blizzaks and RE-71Rs come to mind, experience with both, they are great tires).”
r/FiestaST
·2 Upvotes ·2018-05-14
“I've gone through two sets of RE050As, and I've got 75k on my car. The second set is in dire need of replacement. HTH.”
r/cars
·2 Upvotes ·2017-11-18
“My FiST came with the Potenza RE050A and i am pleasantly surprised with how well they handle. Excellent grip from acceleration and cornering as well as excellent stopping power. The only problem is when it gets cold out and if it's wet the tires don't grip as well as I'd like but other than that no complaints.”
Top-Themen
#Dry grip and handling#Wet and cold performance#Tread life and mileage#Run-flat options#Aging tire design#Pricing and value
Basierend auf 13 Community-Beiträgen
Reifen B
Gemischt
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
r/TeslaModelS
·3 Upvotes ·2025-11-25
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
r/kereta
·3 Upvotes ·2024-05-12
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
r/TeslaModel3
·1 Upvote ·2024-02-10
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Top-Themen
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Max Performance | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 10 | 68 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 18″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Profiltiefe | 7,9 mm (10/32″) | 7,9 mm (10/32″) |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 300 A A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | 3,4 bar (50 psi) |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
73
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
76
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
Sieger: Falken Azenis FK510 — besser bei Nass, Laufleistung und Handling. Wählen Sie den Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, wenn Ihnen Geräusch, Schnee und Trocken am wichtigsten sind.
Reifen A wählen
Sie wollen einen leiseren Innenraum
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A erreicht 90 vs 71 bei Geräusch.
Reifen B wählen
Ihnen ist Sicherheit bei Nässe am wichtigsten
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 85 vs 70 bei Nass.
Reifen B wählen
Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 75 vs 66 bei Laufleistung.
Reifen B wählen
Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 81 vs 72 bei Handling.
Reifen A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Reifen B · Falken Azenis FK510
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.