Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Azenis FK510 führt, 77–74 Knapper Vorsprung
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 88 · 36 Tests Besitzer 72 · 181 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 7 im 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test (aquaplaning quer)
“Lateral dry rot - Bridgestone Turanza T005 DOT 21, 3rd summer on service - all 4 tires have these cracks on their laterals, should I be worried?”
Tests 72 · 29 Tests Besitzer 80 · 384 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 20 im 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (preis-leistung)
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 87 | 74 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 86 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 80 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 97 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 96% | 70% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 97% |
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 83 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 82 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 91 |
| Aquaplaning längs (% vom Besten) | 97% | 60% |
| Aquaplaning quer (% vom Besten) | 88% | 70% |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 86% | 94% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 84% | 93% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 98% | 99% |
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 68 | 48 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 72 | 77 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 95 |
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 75 | 60 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 88 |
| Außengeräusch (% vom Besten) | 80% | 70% |
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 67 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 66 | 71 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 80 |
| Quelle | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 72 | 81 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 84 | 86 |
| Kategorie | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 74 | 77 |
| Trocken | 84 | 80 |
| Nass | 81 | 85 |
| Komfort | 70 | 61 |
| Geräusch | 75 | 76 |
| Laufleistung | 66 | 75 |
| Handling | 72 | 81 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Turanza T005
Azenis FK510
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Turanza T005 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +0,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 96% #6/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 70% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +26,5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 99% #2/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +1,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 100% #1/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 87% #7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test | +12,5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Außengeräusch | Geräusch | 80% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +10,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 97% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | +1,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 96% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 80% #6/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +16,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Safety | Sonstige | 90% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 60% #10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +30,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Steering Response | Sonstige | 89% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 67% #10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +22,2 | Gleicher Test |
| Wet Lateral Stability | Sonstige | 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 73% #43/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 59% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +13,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 84% #6/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 70% #14/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +14,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 14% #7/53 · 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | 20% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | −5,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 100% #1/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | +5,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 100% #3/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test | 78% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | +22,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 89% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 50% #9/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | +39,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 80% #6/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 78% #7/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +2,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Nass | 97% #6/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | 60% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +36,5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning quer | Nass | 88% #7/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | 70% #6/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +18,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 86% #3/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 94% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −7,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 84% #1/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | −8,6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 98% #4/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | 99% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | −0,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided. While some drivers praise its wet-weather performance, highway stability, and value compared to competitors like Michelin, others report issues with excessive road noise, stiff comfort levels, rapid wear, and poor grip in certain conditions.
“The Bridgestone Turanza T005 UHP Summer tires suck My BMW i4 e40 has 8k miles on it. I usually never get flats, but in the past 8 months I have almost been stranded 3 times by flats, and I have had to replace two of tires because they were completely worn. These Bridgestone Turanza T005 UHP Summer tires are terrible. I've been replacing the worn tires with run-flats, but probably time to move to a different brand and all-season tire.”
“I drove my friend’s Leon Cupra fitted with these Turanza T005 18” last summer to Croatia. Rountrip plus some local driving, all in all 2k km, the tyres were totally okay driving on highways and local roads. Not noisy. Good tyres for sure.”
“Bridgestone Turanza T005 tyres... Are they really shit or is there something wrong with my car? I've just had brand new ones fitted, I don't expect them to be amazing in this weather but I'm slipping and sliding all over the place. My car has less grip than my old tyres with 2mm left. Seriously, I went round a roundabout last night at 20mph and drifted out from the inner lane. Could there be something I need to get checked because I don't feel quite safe with them on... Read more”
Basierend auf 23 Community-Beiträgen
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 24 | 68 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Profiltiefe | — | 7,9 mm (10/32″) |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 300 A A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | — | 3,4 bar (50 psi) |
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Falken Azenis FK510
Sieger: Falken Azenis FK510 — besser bei Laufleistung, Handling und Nass. Wählen Sie den Bridgestone Turanza T005, wenn Ihnen Komfort und Trocken am wichtigsten sind.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 erreicht 70 vs 61 bei Komfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 75 vs 66 bei Laufleistung.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 81 vs 72 bei Handling.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 erreicht 84 vs 80 bei Trocken.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.
