Tests 86 · 4 Tests Besitzer 85 · 212 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 4 im 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 (handling trocken)
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
ADVAN A052 führt, 81–77 Knapper Vorsprung
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 86 · 4 Tests Besitzer 85 · 212 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 4 im 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 (handling trocken)
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Tests 72 · 29 Tests Besitzer 80 · 384 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 3 von 16 im 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (gesamtplatzierung)
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 92 | 74 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 93 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 99 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 97 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 94% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 100% | 97% |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 91 | 83 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 68 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 78 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 91 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 100% | 99% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 93% | 97% |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 75 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 48 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 78 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 77 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 95 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 60 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 88 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 58 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 52 | 71 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 80 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 96 | 81 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | – | 86 |
| Kategorie | Yokohama ADVAN A052 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 81 | 77 |
| Trocken | 92 | 80 |
| Nass | 82 | 85 |
| Schnee | 100 | – |
| Komfort | 78 | 61 |
| Geräusch | 100 | 76 |
| Laufleistung | 58 | 75 |
| Handling | 96 | 81 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Für keinen der beiden Reifen gibt es hier schon eine Wertung, diese Gewichtung ändert also nichts.
ADVAN A052
Azenis FK510
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | ADVAN A052 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 99% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 94% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test | +4,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +2,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Steering Response | Sonstige | 93% #4/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 67% #10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +26,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Wet Lateral Stability | Sonstige | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +20,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 33% #3/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +66,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | 75% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test | +25,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test | +0,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 93% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | 97% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | −3,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Basierend auf 8 Community-Beiträgen
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Yokohama ADVAN A052 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Rennstrecke und Motorsport | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 21 | 68 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Profiltiefe | 5,6 mm (7/32″) | 7,9 mm (10/32″) |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 300 A A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | 3,5 bar (51 psi) | 3,4 bar (50 psi) |
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Falken Azenis FK510
Sieger: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — besser bei Geräusch, Komfort und Handling. Wählen Sie den Falken Azenis FK510, wenn Ihnen Laufleistung und Nass am wichtigsten sind.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 erreicht 100 vs 76 bei Geräusch.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 erreicht 78 vs 61 bei Komfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 75 vs 58 bei Laufleistung.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 erreicht 96 vs 81 bei Handling.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.