Maloya Crono 480 im Test
The Maloya Crono 480 is perceived as a disappointing budget-oriented option that fails to deliver on expectations of Vredestein-derived quality. While the tire offers acceptable dry-weather performance and low noise levels, it suffers from significant deficiencies in wet-weather traction and premature tread wear.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
51%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 1 Besitzerbewertung bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The Maloya Crono 480 is perceived as a disappointing budget-oriented option that fails to deliver on expectations of Vredestein-derived quality. While the tire offers acceptable dry-weather performance and low noise levels, it suffers from significant deficiencies in wet-weather traction and premature tread wear.
Vorteile
- Acceptable grip levels on dry road surfaces
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Stable handling that does not track road joints or white lines
Nachteile
- Poor wet-weather traction and frequent wheel spin
- Short tread life, with reports of replacement needed after only 6,000 miles
- Fails to meet performance expectations associated with its parent brand
Gut zu wissen
- Performance issues, specifically wheel spin, were noted even on low-horsepower vehicles like a 90hp diesel van.