Zum Inhalt springen
Aktualisiert Mai 2026

Riken UHP im Test

The Riken UHP is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip for its price point, often drawing comparisons to premium brands. However, user experiences are polarized, with significant concerns regarding long-term durability and a notable vulnerability to sidewall damage from road hazards.

Relativer Score
73/100
Tests + Besitzer
Besitzerbewertungen
72/100
17 Bewertungen
Riken UHP
Bewertungen

Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich

Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.

Nach Besitzerbewertungen

72%
Würden wieder kaufen 65%
Trocken
Trocken gesamt
81%
Nass
Nass gesamt
67%
Komfort
Komfort gesamt
74%
Laufleistung
Laufleistung gesamt
73%
Handling
Handling gesamt
72%
Von Besitzern

Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht

Themen aus 17 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.

The Riken UHP is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip for its price point, often drawing comparisons to premium brands. However, user experiences are polarized, with significant concerns regarding long-term durability and a notable vulnerability to sidewall damage from road hazards.

Vorteile

  • Exceptional price-to-performance value
  • Strong dry road traction and handling
  • Competent wet weather performance for the price
  • Generally low noise levels and comfortable ride quality

Nachteile

  • Highly susceptible to sidewall bulges and damage from potholes
  • Inconsistent performance as tread depth decreases
  • Reports of unpredictable handling in wet conditions by some users
  • Concerns regarding overall material quality and longevity

Gut zu wissen

  • Users with heavier vehicles, such as the BMW E38, reported high satisfaction with grip levels during highway driving.
  • Drivers with low-profile tire setups noted that while the soft sidewall improves comfort, it significantly increases the risk of structural damage on poor road surfaces.