Silverstone M5 Synergy im Test
The Silverstone M5 Synergy is widely regarded as a poor-performing tire, particularly in wet and cold conditions where users report severe traction loss and dangerous aquaplaning. While some owners acknowledge its affordability and suitability for low-speed, dry-weather commuting, the consensus is that the tire's lack of safety and high noise levels make it an unsuitable choice for most drivers.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
43%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 16 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The Silverstone M5 Synergy is widely regarded as a poor-performing tire, particularly in wet and cold conditions where users report severe traction loss and dangerous aquaplaning. While some owners acknowledge its affordability and suitability for low-speed, dry-weather commuting, the consensus is that the tire's lack of safety and high noise levels make it an unsuitable choice for most drivers.
Vorteile
- Low purchase price and high affordability
- Acceptable performance for low-speed, dry-weather city driving
- Low rolling resistance contributing to fuel economy
Nachteile
- Extremely poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
- Poor structural integrity, including reports of sidewall cracking, bubbling, and premature deformation
- Unpredictable handling characteristics that provide little warning before losing grip
Gut zu wissen
- Users driving smaller, economy-focused vehicles (e.g., Nissan Micra) find the tire acceptable for basic daily commuting, provided they avoid wet conditions.
- Drivers of slightly more powerful vehicles report that the tire's lack of grip is exacerbated, leading to dangerous handling characteristics even at moderate speeds.