Yokohama Geolandar G98A im Test
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
60%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 15 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Vorteile
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
- Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions
Nachteile
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
- High price-to-longevity ratio
Gut zu wissen
- Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
- Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.