Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Dunlop

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response

Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
–/100
Noch keine Testdaten
Besitzer (40 %)
80/100
113 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
88
Nass
84
Schnee
–
Komfort
80
Geräusch
–
Laufleistung
76
Handling
77

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Michelin

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Ganzjahresreifen · Premium Touring

Michelin CrossClimate 2 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
95/100
37 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
81/100
143 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
90
Nass
83
Schnee
82
Komfort
77
Geräusch
72
Laufleistung
82
Handling
74

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitZu knapp für ein Urteil: Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response und Michelin CrossClimate 2 liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response ist stärker bei Komfort und Handling. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ist stärker bei Laufleistung.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

7 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 2 vorn
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
88
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
90
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 92
Tire Rack Besitzer – 94
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 86
America's Tire Besitzer – 98

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) SP Sport Fast Response liegt 1 vorn
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
84
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
83
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 84
Tire Rack Besitzer – 94
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 84 82
America's Tire Besitzer – 97

Schnee

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
–
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 80
Tire Rack Besitzer – 88
Tyre Reviews Besitzer – 85

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) SP Sport Fast Response liegt 3 vorn
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
80
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
77
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 73
Tire Rack Besitzer – 89
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 80 84
America's Tire Besitzer – 96

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
–
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
72
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 72
America's Tire Besitzer – 92

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 6 vorn
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
76
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Tire Rack Besitzer – 91
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 76 82
America's Tire Besitzer – 95

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) SP Sport Fast Response liegt 3 vorn
A — Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
77
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
74
Warum dieser Score
QuelleSP Sport Fast ResponseCrossClimate 2
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 77 74
America's Tire Besitzer – 97
DriverReviews Besitzer – 84

Scores im Überblick

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieDunlop SP Sport Fast ResponseMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relativer Score 81 82
Trocken 88 90
Nass 84 83
Schnee – 82
Komfort 80 77
Geräusch – 72
Laufleistung 76 82
Handling 77 74

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.

Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response

The Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile touring tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering a significant performance upgrade over budget or older OEM tires. While most users praise its quiet operation and comfortable ride, there is a clear divide regarding its suitability for high-performance vehicles, where some drivers find the sidewall too soft and the tread life insufficient for spirited driving.

Vorteile

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • High value for money compared to other premium brands
  • Responsive handling for daily and touring use

Nachteile

  • Rapid tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Soft sidewalls can feel imprecise on high-performance or sports cars
  • Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions

Beobachtungen

  • Users with high-horsepower sports cars (e.g., C63s AMG, WRX STi) frequently reported disappointment with sidewall flex and lack of traction under heavy acceleration.
  • Drivers of mid-sized sedans and touring vehicles (e.g., Mondeo, Alfa 156) consistently report the tire transforms the vehicle's comfort and handling compared to factory-fitted alternatives.
  • Tread life appears highly dependent on driving style, with 'mile-munchers' achieving over 30,000 miles, while spirited drivers report wear-out points as early as 9,000-15,000 miles.
Reifen B Michelin CrossClimate 2

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is widely regarded as a benchmark all-weather tire, offering exceptional snow and ice traction that rivals dedicated winter tires while maintaining respectable dry and wet performance. While most users praise its year-round versatility and comfort, a subset of owners reports concerns regarding wet-weather confidence, increased road noise as the tire wears, and a noticeable impact on fuel efficiency.

Vorteile

  • Outstanding snow and ice traction for an all-season tire
  • Excellent dry road handling and braking performance
  • High levels of ride comfort and noise refinement when new
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • Long-term durability and tread life for many users

Nachteile

  • Noticeable drop in fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or low-rolling-resistance tires
  • Increased road noise and ride stiffness as the tread wears down
  • Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users reporting understeer or lack of confidence
  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Performance degradation in extreme summer heat

Beobachtungen

  • EV and hybrid owners frequently report a 5-7% reduction in range or fuel efficiency due to higher rolling resistance.
  • Users with high-performance or high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Mustang) often find the tire's sidewall and compound too soft for spirited driving, leading to unpredictable handling.
  • Drivers of heavier SUVs and crossovers generally report higher satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle inclement weather compared to lighter passenger cars.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response

Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.

Reifen B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Gemischt

Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is largely positive regarding its exceptional snow, ice, and wet weather traction, with many users praising its quiet ride and aggressive look. However, some dissenters point out potential drawbacks such as increased road noise as the tread ages, a minor hit to fuel economy or EV range, and questioned value for users who live in mild climates without winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 Upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

r/crv ·53 Upvotes ·2023-06-23

“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”

r/MachE ·37 Upvotes ·2026-07-23

“PSA: Michelin CrossClimate 2 - They make noise. Recently purchased Michelin Cross Climate 2s for my MachE from Costco. I received a fairly decent price (1,000 for 4) vs local competitors (1,400 for 4). I've seen a lot of people say how great they are, and I thought I'd give them a shot. They look nice. They definitely give it a more 'off-road' look. They also come with a 65,000 mile warranty which they said applied to EVs as well, which is nice as well. They feel great driving. I appreciate their excellent traction and feel secure on turns. I haven't been able to test them on snow yet, but they perform well on wet roads. That being said. They definitely make noise. They make a little at lower, city speeds (~35 mph). They also make a really weird noise at highway speeds (~70 mph+). Neither is so loud or annoying that a little radio can't cover up the sound. Overall, I am very pleased with the tire and the price I received. However, be warned, they do make noise. EDIT: I originally posted this is the Ford Mustang MachE forum and forgot to say that I put them on my MachE. The MachE, being an EV, may be why the noise is more noticeable for me versus others. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·35 Upvotes ·2026-01-18

“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”

Top-Themen
#Snow and ice performance#Wet weather traction#Road noise and ride comfort#Fuel economy and EV range impact#Tread wear and longevity#Price and value comparison

Basierend auf 393 Community-Beiträgen

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
KategorieSommerreifen · Ultra High PerformanceGanzjahresreifen · Premium Touring
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Profiltiefe—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Laufleistungsgarantie—97.000 km
SeitenwandBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max. Druck—50 - 51 psi
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Dunlop

Michelin

Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response und Michelin CrossClimate 2 liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response ist stärker bei Komfort und Handling. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ist stärker bei Laufleistung.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 82 vs 76 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response erreicht 80 vs 77 bei Komfort.

Reifen A wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response erreicht 77 vs 74 bei Handling.

Reifen A · Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response
Reifen B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.