Tests 86 · 4 Tests Besitzer 85 · 212 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 4 im 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 (lateral stability)
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Potenza RE 71RS führt, 82–81 Knapper Vorsprung
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 86 · 4 Tests Besitzer 85 · 212 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 4 im 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 (lateral stability)
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Tests 83 · 2 Tests Besitzer 90 · 450 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 3 im 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test (handling trocken)
“Track tire fitment Just got some new Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs in 245/40r18. I did my research on this subreddit and it seems like that will fit without rubbing/camber bolts. Does anyone know if the RE-71rs’ run wide cause they measure a full inch wider than the stock PS4s’, I’m just wondering now if I’ll need camber bolts. I’d prefer not, just want to throw them on and go. For reference they are being mounted onto a 18x8.5 +45 Enkei TS-V wheel. If anyone could offer insight cause I just can’t understand how they would fit but maybe I’m just over thinking it. Stock suspension by the way. I searched the sub and didn’t see anything with exact matching specs, only bigger and different tires. Tl;dr Will 245/40r18 Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs’ fit on an 18x8.5 +45 wheel without clearance issues/adding other modifications (camber bolts) on our car? Thanks for any help! Read more”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 92 | 95 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 93 | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 99 | 95 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 100 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 96% | 99% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 99% |
| Trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 98% |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 91 | 100 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 68 | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 78 | 75 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 100 |
| Nass (% vom Besten) | 98% | 100% |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 100% | 100% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 97% | 100% |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | – |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 78 | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 61 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 70 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 70 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 58 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 52 | 67 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 100 | 70 |
| Quelle | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 96 | 97 |
| Kategorie | Yokohama ADVAN A052 | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 81 | 82 |
| Trocken | 92 | 95 |
| Nass | 82 | 88 |
| Schnee | 100 | – |
| Komfort | 78 | 75 |
| Geräusch | 100 | 70 |
| Laufleistung | 58 | 71 |
| Handling | 96 | 97 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Für keinen der beiden Reifen gibt es hier schon eine Wertung, diese Gewichtung ändert also nichts.
ADVAN A052
Potenza RE 71RS
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | ADVAN A052 | Potenza RE 71RS | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 96% #2/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | 99% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −2,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 99% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | 99% #1/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | +0,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Trocken | Trocken | 98% #3/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 98% #4/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | +0,3 | Gleicher Test |
| Lateral Stability | Sonstige | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 97% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | +2,7 | Gleicher Test |
| Steering Response | Sonstige | 93% #4/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 96% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −2,7 | Gleicher Test |
| Komfort | Sonstige | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 96% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | +3,9 | Gleicher Test |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 98% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | +2,3 | Gleicher Test |
| Steering Response | Sonstige | 97% #3/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 98% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −0,6 | Gleicher Test |
| Wet Lateral Stability | Sonstige | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Steering Response | Sonstige | 97% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −3,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Nass | Nass | 98% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −1,8 | Gleicher Test |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 97% #2/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | 100% #1/4 · 2022 TireRack Extreme Performance Summer Tire Test R17 | −2,9 | Gleicher Test |
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Basierend auf 8 Community-Beiträgen
The community regards the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS as an exceptionally sticky and high-performing extreme performance tire, often sought after for track use and spirited driving. Users frequently discuss clearance sales, sizing and fitment nuances (noting they tend to run wide), and their limited tread life given their 200-treadwear rating. Overall, users are very enthusiastic about their grip and handling capabilities.
“Need heat cycle advice I recently got a screaming deal on some Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS for my daily driver. It usually doesn't see track time but I figured it would be fun to try it out for the cost. The tires were cheap because they had a 2021 production date. In the past to heat cycle a tire, I've just driven on the highway a couple of hours and let the tire sit for 24 hours. The hurdle is, It's winter and too cold to really make an impact. To add to that, I doubt I will have clean enough roads for that tire. My track does have winter lapping when it is clean and dry, but it still may be cold. Any suggestions on how to get a heat cycle on these tires in cold temperatures? Read more”
“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”
Basierend auf 8 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Yokohama ADVAN A052 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Rennstrecke und Motorsport | Sommerreifen · Rennstrecke und Motorsport |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Verfügbare Größen | 21 | 10 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Profiltiefe | 5,6 mm (7/32″) | 5,6 mm (7/32″) |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 200 A A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | 3,5 bar (51 psi) | 3,5 bar (51 psi) |
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Yokohama ADVAN A052 und Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Yokohama ADVAN A052 ist stärker bei Geräusch und Komfort. Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS ist stärker bei Laufleistung, Nass und Trocken.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 erreicht 100 vs 70 bei Geräusch.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS erreicht 71 vs 58 bei Laufleistung.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS erreicht 88 vs 82 bei Nass.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 erreicht 78 vs 75 bei Komfort.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.