Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 90 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 74 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 88 | – |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 78 | 65 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 79 | – |
Schnee
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 47 | – |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 2 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 75 | 68 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 84 | – |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 34 | – |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 83 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 81 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 79 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 72 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 73 | 75 |
| Trocken | 89 | 86 |
| Nass | 75 | 69 |
| Schnee | 36 | – |
| Komfort | 34 | 75 |
| Geräusch | 52 | – |
| Laufleistung | 78 | 78 |
| Handling | 81 | 72 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Vorteile
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Nachteile
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Beobachtungen
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
The Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS is a polarizing tire that serves as a durable, long-lasting street-oriented performance tire rather than a dedicated track semi-slick. While many users criticize it for failing to match the legendary dry grip and track-day performance of its predecessor, the AD08R, it is widely praised by those who prioritize longevity, consistent handling, and daily drivability over ultimate lap times.
Vorteile
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to traditional 200TW track tires.
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics for spirited street driving.
- Surprisingly capable in wet conditions for a tire with this tread pattern.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures without overheating.
Nachteile
- Significant reduction in dry grip and 'bite' compared to the previous AD08R model.
- Frequent reports of audible squealing when approaching the limit, which can be misleading to drivers.
- Harder compound requires more aggressive driving or specific pressure management to reach optimal operating temperature.
- Not suitable for competitive track use where maximum mechanical grip is required.
Beobachtungen
- Users with lightweight, mid-engine platforms (e.g., Lotus Elise, MR2) report better satisfaction with the tire's balance and predictability.
- High-horsepower RWD vehicles often struggle with traction, with some users noting the tire is insufficient for cars exceeding 400hp.
- Drivers of FWD hatchbacks appreciate the tire's longevity for dual-purpose road and occasional track use.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Basierend auf 20 Community-Beiträgen
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Rennstrecke und Motorsport |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 37 | — |
| Felgendurchmesser | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Profiltiefe | 7,1 mm (9/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,5 bar (51 psi) | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Sieger: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — besser bei Komfort. Wählen Sie den Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, wenn Ihnen Handling, Nass und Trocken am wichtigsten sind.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS erreicht 75 vs 34 bei Komfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 erreicht 81 vs 72 bei Handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 erreicht 75 vs 69 bei Nass.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 erreicht 89 vs 86 bei Trocken.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.