Direktvergleich Aktualisiert

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — im Vergleich

Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.

Pilot Sport 5 liegt vorn, 88–74

Ihre Größe angeben für genaue Treffer
/R

Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Reifen ABridgestone

Potenza S001

Sommerreifen · Max Performance

Tests 74 · 4 Tests Besitzer 69 · 176 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 49 im 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test (bremsen nass)

“Mount all 4 tires Bridgestone Potenza S001 215/45R20 on i3s stock rims 5.5” front 15mm spacers and 6.5” rear After much convincing I have mounted all four tires of the same size purchased on TireRack for $83 each on i3s stock staggered rims. Smooth and stable. Looking gooddddddd!”

Reifen BMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Sommerreifen · Max Performance

Tests 95 · 22 Tests Besitzer 94 · 2.038 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 2 von 20 im 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (verschleiß)

“My 8-month experience with Michelin Pilot Sport 5 – honest thoughts after highway + city use Switched to Michelin Pilot Sport 5s about 8 months ago on my Hyundai Creta]and figured I'd share a proper update since I couldn't find many India-based long-term reviews when I was researching. Background: I drive a mix of Delhi–Gurugram highway stretches and stop-go city traffic. Previous tyres were Ceat tyres. Wet grip: This is where they genuinely shine. Monsoon season in NCR was the real test — braking distances felt noticeably shorter than my previous set, and I never had that nervous moment on waterlogged roads near Dhaula Kuan. Dry handling: Confident and predictable. Not much to complain about here. Cornering feel is crisp, especially at highway speeds. Ride comfort: Slightly firmer than my old tyres, which I expected given the performance focus. Not harsh — just different. Long highway runs are still comfortable. Noise: Quieter than I expected for a performance tyre. Road noise on concrete sections of NH-48 is very manageable. Fuel efficiency: Marginal difference — maybe 0.3–0.5 kmpl lower, hard to say definitively. Wear so far: Looking good at 8 months / ~7,000 km. No uneven wear patterns. Would I buy again? Probably yes, especially if wet weather safety matters to you. Price premium over budget options is real, but the wet grip gives peace of mind. Happy to answer any questions. Anyone else running Michelins in Indian conditions? Read more”

Kategorie für Kategorie

Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.

  1. 84

    Trocken

    Pilot Sport 5 +7
    91
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)8487
    Tire Rack Besitzer88–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer8390
    SimpleTire Besitzer80–
    Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten)93%93%
    Handling trocken (% vom Besten)98%95%
  2. 83

    Nass

    Pilot Sport 5 +7
    90
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)9187
    Tire Rack Besitzer80–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer6991
    SimpleTire Besitzer80–
    Bremsen nass (% vom Besten)100%95%
    Handling nass (% vom Besten)100%98%
  3. 51

    Komfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +34
    85
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)4480
    Tire Rack Besitzer80–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer6084
    SimpleTire Besitzer80–
  4. 85

    Geräusch

    Potenza S001 +8
    77
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)8567
    SimpleTire Besitzer80–
  5. 67

    Laufleistung

    Pilot Sport 5 +23
    90
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Tire Rack Besitzer62–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer6781
    SimpleTire Besitzer80–
  6. 74

    Handling

    Pilot Sport 5 +21
    95
    Warum dieser Score
    QuellePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer7483
    DriverReviews Besitzer8488
Scores im Überblick
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieBridgestone Potenza S001Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Relativer Score 74 88
Trocken 84 91
Nass 83 90
Komfort 51 85
Geräusch 85 77
Laufleistung 67 90
Handling 74 95

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Potenza S001

Pilot Sport 5

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategoriePotenza S001Pilot Sport 5ΔBeide?
Bremsen trocken Trocken 93% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 93% #8/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −0,3 Verschiedene Tests
Handling trocken Trocken 98% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 95% #2/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers +2,4 Verschiedene Tests
Rollwiderstand Effizienz 100% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 85% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +14,8 Verschiedene Tests
Geräusch Sonstige 96% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #5/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test −3,1 Verschiedene Tests
Preis Sonstige 83% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #13/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test −16,5 Verschiedene Tests
Preis-Leistung Sonstige 100% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 89% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test +11,0 Verschiedene Tests
Verschleiß Sonstige 62% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 93% #2/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test −31,5 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 20% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 33% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test −13,3 Verschiedene Tests
Aquaplaning längs Geradeaus 95% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 94% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers +1,4 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Komfort Subjektiv 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #2/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test −28,6 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling trocken Subjektiv 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 92% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −1,7 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling nass Subjektiv 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 89% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 −10,9 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtkosten Gesamt 0% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #5/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test 0,0 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen nass Nass 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 95% #4/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test +5,3 Verschiedene Tests
Handling nass Nass 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers +1,9 Verschiedene Tests

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Potenza S001

Vorteile

  • Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering stability.
  • Sharp, responsive steering feedback and turn-in precision.
  • Strong rim protection due to robust sidewall construction.

Nachteile

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone, especially as the tire wears.
  • Poor wet-weather performance, with many reports of sudden traction loss and hydroplaning.
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, often failing to meet mileage expectations.
Alle Besitzer-Themen im Potenza S001-Test

Reifen B Pilot Sport 5

Vorteile

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of comfort and reduced road noise compared to many competitors
  • Strong tread life and durability for an ultra-high-performance tire

Nachteile

  • Softer sidewall construction leads to less steering precision and feedback
  • Tendency toward understeer when pushed to the absolute limit
  • Higher price point compared to some direct competitors
Alle Besitzer-Themen im Pilot Sport 5-Test

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Gemischt

Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is divided, with some users praising their dry grip and stability, while many others criticize their rapid wear, stiffness (especially run-flat variants), noise, and cracking issues. Owners frequently compare them unfavorably to alternatives like Michelin or Pirelli, though budget-friendly deals tend to draw occasional interest.

r/TyreReviews ·3 Upvotes ·2026-02-22

“Replacing Bridgestone Potenza s001 RunFlats with Primacy 5 vs. PS5. Suggestions? I drive a VW Jetta which only has 160 Hp. I do occasionally really enjoy some spirited driving or taking aggressive turns. My considerations are that I do really care about Comfort and road noise and so that leads me towards the Primacy 5. At the same time, I don't think the power of my car justifies the PS5. My question is basically, I've online that for runflats to be runflats they have really stiff sidewalls, which might be contributing to the current feel of my car and I wonder if, even though everything else about the Potenza s001 is quite worse compared to the Primacy 5, I wonder if I will miss the stiff sidewall? And just because of that should I consider the PS5?”

r/CarTalkUK ·2 Upvotes ·2023-11-15

“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”

r/BMWi3 ·1 Upvote ·2024-01-09

“I put the Potenza S001 tires on the rear of my i3s with that Tire Rack deal but I didn't think they would fit on the 5.5 inch rims. I think the rears are 6.0".”

Top-Themen
#Tread Wear and Longevity#Run-Flat Stiffness and Comfort#Road Noise and Harshness#Dry Grip and Stability#Quality and Cracking Issues#Value and Deals

Basierend auf 16 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positiv

Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to older generations and direct rivals. While some enthusiast drivers find the sidewalls a bit soft or note less extreme dry grip and steering feel compared to hardcore track tires like the PS4S or SportContact 7, it is widely praised as the ultimate daily-driver performance tire.

r/i20n ·17 Upvotes ·2025-07-21

“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”

r/CarsAustralia ·8 Upvotes ·2025-09-10

“In my experience they are quite long wearing tires and well worth the cost. I used to get around 40k out of most tyres. My first set of ps4’s lasted 55k and now the ps5’s are trending to beat it. I'm a pretty spirited driver around the roundabouts of Canberra too, though I only have a hatch so experiences may vary. As to performance I've driven them on my i30 n-line and other people’s i30N, BRZ, tesla 3, and stinger and the tyres have more grip than I have guts to push them on public roads. In both wet and dry they are very confidence inspiring and a hell of a lot of fun.”

r/DubaiPetrolHeads ·3 Upvotes ·2025-07-15

“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”

Top-Themen
#Wet grip and safety#Road noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Daily driving performance#Comparison with PS4S#Value and pricing

Basierend auf 130 Community-Beiträgen

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
KategorieSommerreifen · Max PerformanceSommerreifen · Max Performance
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / Crossover—
Verfügbare Größen15—
Felgendurchmesser17″ – 21″—
Profiltiefe6,4 mm (8/32″)—
UTQG280 A A—
SeitenwandBlackwall—
Max. Druck3,4 bar (50 psi)—

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Sieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Wählen Sie den Bridgestone Potenza S001, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 85 vs 51 bei Komfort.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 90 vs 67 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen B wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 95 vs 74 bei Handling.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen einen leiseren Innenraum

Bridgestone Potenza S001 erreicht 85 vs 77 bei Geräusch.

Reifen A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Reifen B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.

88

Führt

Pilot Sport 5

Amazon