Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 90 | 88 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 97% | 100% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 99% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 86 | 83 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 99% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 86% | 95% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 86% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 98% |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 81 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 82 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 70 | 85 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 91 | 78 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 84 | 83 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 84 | 80 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 84 | 83 |
| Trocken | 87 | 88 |
| Nass | 82 | 82 |
| Komfort | 83 | 86 |
| Geräusch | 70 | 85 |
| Laufleistung | 91 | 78 |
| Handling | 84 | 83 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 80% #9/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | -12.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 97% #17/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 100% #3/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -2.7 | Gleicher Test |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #2/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -1.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 97% #2/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 88% #4/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | +8.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 95% #2/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | 90% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +5.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 49% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 54% #8/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -5 | Gleicher Test |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 98% #5/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -0.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 84% #8/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | 79% #6/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | +5.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 58% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 58% #10/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +0.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 72% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +28 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 17% #6/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 9% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +7.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 89% #7/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 91% #7/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | -1.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 93% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | -2.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 96% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | +1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Geräusch | Subjektiv | 100% #1/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | 80% #11/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | +20 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 92% #3/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | 85% #6/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | +7.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 0% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 99% #4/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | 99% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 86% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 95% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -9 | Gleicher Test |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 86% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +12.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 94% #1/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | -3.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is widely regarded as a premier touring tire, consistently praised for its exceptional longevity, comfort, and low noise levels. While most users report a transformative improvement in ride quality and fuel efficiency compared to OEM tires, a minority of drivers note a 'vague' steering feel due to soft sidewalls and occasional reports of increased noise as the tire ages.
Vorteile
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Significant improvement over factory-fitted eco-tires
Nachteile
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Reported increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Not suitable for aggressive or sporty driving styles
- Occasional reports of structural issues or vibration at higher mileages
Beobachtungen
- Users with heavy EVs and diesel estates report impressive mileage, often exceeding 40,000 miles.
- Drivers of vehicles with stiff 'sports' suspension noted that the tire's soft sidewall helps significantly with comfort, though it reduces steering precision.
- Some users on 16-inch and 17-inch wheels noted that the tire's comfort-oriented design makes the vehicle feel less 'sharp' compared to UHP alternatives.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is widely regarded as a high-value, premium-touring tire that excels in comfort, low noise, and wet-weather confidence. While most users praise its balanced performance and competitive pricing, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding rapid tread wear and a noticeable decline in grip as the tires approach the end of their service life.
Vorteile
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily driving
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and stable cornering characteristics
Nachteile
- Reports of rapid tread wear and premature degradation
- Noticeable decline in wet grip performance as tread depth decreases
- Sidewalls perceived as fragile or prone to damage by some users
- Performance drop-off in near-freezing temperatures
Beobachtungen
- Some users of heavier vehicles, including EVs, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and stiff sidewalls.
- Drivers of high-torque or turbocharged vehicles occasionally noted traction issues (wheel spin) during acceleration, suggesting the tire may struggle with aggressive power delivery.
- Users who upsized their tire profile reported improved ride comfort and corrected speedometer accuracy.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Community feedback for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, highlighting exceptional durability, great wet performance, and high comfort levels. Some users note drawbacks such as softer sidewalls affecting sharp handling during spirited driving, while others debate comparisons with rival brands like Michelin and Continental.
“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
“close call, if you looking for rolling resistance Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the right one but otherwise is PC6. You can see how the newer PC7 fair against the Goodyear below”
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
Basierend auf 9 Community-Beiträgen
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with users praising it as a strong, high-value touring tire that often rivals more expensive premium brands like Michelin. Reviewers and owners highlight its good performance in both dry and wet conditions, though longevity estimates in professional tests show some variation. Overall, it is seen as a significant upgrade over budget or stock tires and a great choice for everyday driving.
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Basierend auf 13 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Profiltiefe | 6,4 mm (8/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A - AA A | — |
| Seitenwand | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Goodyear
Hankook
Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 und Hankook Ventus Prime 4 liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 ist stärker bei Laufleistung. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ist stärker bei Geräusch und Komfort.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 85 vs 70 bei Geräusch.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 91 vs 78 bei Laufleistung.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 86 vs 83 bei Komfort.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.