Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Hankook

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
91/100
14 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
82/100
76 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
88
Nass
82
Komfort
86
Geräusch
85
Laufleistung
78
Handling
83

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Vredestein

Vredestein Ultrac

Sommerreifen · High Performance

Vredestein Ultrac tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
95/100
13 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
77/100
23 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
87
Nass
84
Komfort
85
Geräusch
78
Laufleistung
64
Handling
77

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — besser bei Laufleistung, Geräusch und Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

6 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 1 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
88
B — Vredestein Ultrac
87
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 88 88
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 84
Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) 93% 97%
Handling trocken (% vom Besten) 98% 98%

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Ultrac liegt 2 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82
B — Vredestein Ultrac
84
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 81 87
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 83 80
Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) 99% 93%
Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) 95% 91%
Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) 86% 98%
Handling nass (% vom Besten) 94% 90%

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 1 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86
B — Vredestein Ultrac
85
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 89 89
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 82 80

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 7 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85
B — Vredestein Ultrac
78
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 85 78

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 14 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78
B — Vredestein Ultrac
64
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 78 64

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 6 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83
B — Vredestein Ultrac
77
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4Ultrac
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 83 77
DriverReviews Besitzer 80 80

Scores im Überblick

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieHankook Ventus Prime 4Vredestein Ultrac
Relativer Score 83 78
Trocken 88 87
Nass 82 84
Komfort 86 85
Geräusch 85 78
Laufleistung 78 64
Handling 83 77

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

Testdaten

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategorieReifen AReifen BΔBeide?
Aquaplaning quer Kurve 82% #17/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test -17.9 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen trocken Trocken 93% #13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test -4 Verschiedene Tests
Handling trocken Trocken 98% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test 98% #9/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test +0.4 Gleicher Test
Rollwiderstand Effizienz 82% #6/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test 68% #12/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +14.1 Verschiedene Tests
Kraftstoffverbrauch Kraftstoff 90% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -8.3 Verschiedene Tests
Traktion Gras Gras 83% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested 86% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test -2.7 Verschiedene Tests
Abrieb Sonstige 57% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 100% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -42.7 Verschiedene Tests
Geräusch Sonstige 100% #11/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested 96% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test +3.2 Verschiedene Tests
Preis Sonstige 79% #6/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres 82% #3/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test -3.1 Verschiedene Tests
Preis-Leistung Sonstige 63% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 90% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -27.4 Gleicher Test
Verschleiß Sonstige 77% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 34% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test +43.3 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 13% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 33% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test -20.8 Verschiedene Tests
Traktion Sand Sand 93% #5/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested 89% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test +4.1 Verschiedene Tests
Aquaplaning längs Geradeaus 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test -6.7 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Komfort Subjektiv 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test 95% #2/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested +0.1 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling trocken Subjektiv 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test 80% #9/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test +15 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Geräusch Subjektiv 80% #11/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test 80% #8/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test 0 Gleicher Test
Subj. Handling nass Subjektiv 85% #6/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test 80% #7/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test +4.5 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtkosten Gesamt 0% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0 Gleicher Test
Bremsen nass Nass 99% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 93% #8/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test +6.1 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen nass – Beton Nass 95% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 91% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +4.1 Verschiedene Tests
Kreisbahn nass Nass 86% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test -11.8 Verschiedene Tests
Handling nass Nass 94% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test 90% #1/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test +3.7 Verschiedene Tests
Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Hankook Ventus Prime 4

The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is widely regarded as a high-value, premium-touring tire that excels in comfort, low noise, and wet-weather confidence. While most users praise its balanced performance and competitive pricing, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding rapid tread wear and a noticeable decline in grip as the tires approach the end of their service life.

Vorteile

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
  • Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily driving
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable handling and stable cornering characteristics

Nachteile

  • Reports of rapid tread wear and premature degradation
  • Noticeable decline in wet grip performance as tread depth decreases
  • Sidewalls perceived as fragile or prone to damage by some users
  • Performance drop-off in near-freezing temperatures

Beobachtungen

  • Some users of heavier vehicles, including EVs, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and stiff sidewalls.
  • Drivers of high-torque or turbocharged vehicles occasionally noted traction issues (wheel spin) during acceleration, suggesting the tire may struggle with aggressive power delivery.
  • Users who upsized their tire profile reported improved ride comfort and corrected speedometer accuracy.
Reifen B Vredestein Ultrac

The Vredestein Ultrac is widely regarded as a comfortable, high-performance touring tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a refined, quiet ride. While many users praise its daily driving capabilities and steering feedback, the tire experiences a significant divide in user experience regarding tread longevity, with reports ranging from exceptional durability to premature, rapid wear.

Vorteile

  • Outstanding ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable and consistent handling for daily driving
  • Improved steering feel compared to many entry-level or older performance tires

Nachteile

  • Highly inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Lack of sharp, high-performance steering feedback for aggressive driving
  • Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a lack of stability under heavy cornering
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise or 'hollow' sounds

Beobachtungen

  • Users with smaller, daily-driven vehicles (e.g., C-Max, Audi A1) report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles or those expecting track-day precision often find the sidewalls too soft and the steering feedback lacking compared to dedicated performance tires.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positiv

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with users praising it as a strong, high-value touring tire that often rivals more expensive premium brands like Michelin. Reviewers and owners highlight its good performance in both dry and wet conditions, though longevity estimates in professional tests show some variation. Overall, it is seen as a significant upgrade over budget or stock tires and a great choice for everyday driving.

r/TyreReviews ·6 Upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·4 Upvotes ·2024-03-19

“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”

r/AutomobileRO ·2 Upvotes ·2025-03-23

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

r/CartalkHungary ·2 Upvotes ·2024-09-20

“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”

Top-Themen
#wet and dry grip#touring tire characteristics#price and value comparison#longevity and mileage#EV compatibility symbols#comparison with Michelin Primacy

Basierend auf 13 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Vredestein Ultrac

Positiv

Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.

r/mazda3 ·55 Upvotes ·2025-04-02

“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”

r/CarTalkUK ·22 Upvotes ·2025-05-27

“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”

r/ZL1 ·2 Upvotes ·2013-12-15

“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them. Read more”

r/ZL1 ·2 Upvotes ·2013-12-19

“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”

Top-Themen
#Price and Value Comparison#Comparison to Michelin PS4S#Wet and Dry Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#Handling and Steering Feel

Basierend auf 17 Community-Beiträgen

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Vredestein Ultrac
KategorieSommerreifen · Premium TouringSommerreifen · High Performance
Fahrzeugtyp—Passenger Car / Crossover
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Hankook

Vredestein

Sieger: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — besser bei Laufleistung, Geräusch und Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 78 vs 64 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen einen leiseren Innenraum

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 85 vs 78 bei Geräusch.

Reifen A wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 83 vs 77 bei Handling.

Reifen A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Reifen B · Vredestein Ultrac

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.