Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Yokohama C Drive — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Hankook

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
91/100
14 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
82/100
76 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
88
Nass
82
Komfort
86
Geräusch
85
Laufleistung
78
Handling
83

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Yokohama

Yokohama C Drive

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Yokohama C Drive tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
–/100
Noch keine Testdaten
Besitzer (40 %)
82/100
45 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
86
Nass
82
Komfort
86
Geräusch
–
Laufleistung
77
Handling
77

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — besser bei Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

6 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 2 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
88
B — Yokohama C Drive
86
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 86

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82
B — Yokohama C Drive
82
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 83 82

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86
B — Yokohama C Drive
86
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 82 86

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85
B — Yokohama C Drive
–
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 85 –

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 1 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78
B — Yokohama C Drive
77
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 78 77

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Prime 4 liegt 6 vorn
A — Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83
B — Yokohama C Drive
77
Warum dieser Score
QuelleVentus Prime 4C Drive
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 83 77
DriverReviews Besitzer 80 –

Scores im Überblick

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Yokohama C Drive: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieHankook Ventus Prime 4Yokohama C Drive
Relativer Score 83 81
Trocken 88 86
Nass 82 82
Komfort 86 86
Geräusch 85 –
Laufleistung 78 77
Handling 83 77

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.

Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Hankook Ventus Prime 4

The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is widely regarded as a high-value, premium-touring tire that excels in comfort, low noise, and wet-weather confidence. While most users praise its balanced performance and competitive pricing, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding rapid tread wear and a noticeable decline in grip as the tires approach the end of their service life.

Vorteile

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
  • Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily driving
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable handling and stable cornering characteristics

Nachteile

  • Reports of rapid tread wear and premature degradation
  • Noticeable decline in wet grip performance as tread depth decreases
  • Sidewalls perceived as fragile or prone to damage by some users
  • Performance drop-off in near-freezing temperatures

Beobachtungen

  • Some users of heavier vehicles, including EVs, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and stiff sidewalls.
  • Drivers of high-torque or turbocharged vehicles occasionally noted traction issues (wheel spin) during acceleration, suggesting the tire may struggle with aggressive power delivery.
  • Users who upsized their tire profile reported improved ride comfort and corrected speedometer accuracy.
Reifen B Yokohama C Drive

The Yokohama C Drive is widely regarded as a versatile, comfort-oriented tire that delivers strong performance in both wet and dry conditions. While most users praise its predictable handling and longevity, there is a notable divide in experiences regarding tread life, likely influenced by driving style and vehicle weight.

Vorteile

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors

Nachteile

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions

Beobachtungen

  • Users with smaller hatchbacks (e.g., Honda Jazz, Peugeot 106) frequently cite the tire as a superior, quieter alternative to harsh-riding OEM options.
  • Drivers of heavier or AWD vehicles (e.g., Subaru Forester) noted that opting for XL (Extra Load) variants provides a tauter, more responsive sidewall structure.
  • Performance-oriented drivers noted that while the tire is capable, it is fundamentally designed for comfort rather than dedicated track or high-speed sport use.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positiv

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with users praising it as a strong, high-value touring tire that often rivals more expensive premium brands like Michelin. Reviewers and owners highlight its good performance in both dry and wet conditions, though longevity estimates in professional tests show some variation. Overall, it is seen as a significant upgrade over budget or stock tires and a great choice for everyday driving.

r/TyreReviews ·6 Upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·4 Upvotes ·2024-03-19

“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”

r/AutomobileRO ·2 Upvotes ·2025-03-23

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

r/CartalkHungary ·2 Upvotes ·2024-09-20

“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”

Top-Themen
#wet and dry grip#touring tire characteristics#price and value comparison#longevity and mileage#EV compatibility symbols#comparison with Michelin Primacy

Basierend auf 13 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Yokohama C Drive

Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Yokohama C Drive
KategorieSommerreifen · Premium TouringSommerreifen · Premium Touring
Fahrzeugtyp—Passenger Car / Crossover
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Hankook

Yokohama

Sieger: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — besser bei Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.

Reifen A wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 erreicht 83 vs 77 bei Handling.

Reifen A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Reifen B · Yokohama C Drive

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.