Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Michelin

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Ganzjahresreifen · Premium Touring

Michelin CrossClimate 2 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
95/100
37 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
81/100
143 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
90
Nass
83
Schnee
82
Komfort
77
Geräusch
72
Laufleistung
82
Handling
74

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
–/100
Noch keine Testdaten
Besitzer (40 %)
85/100
10 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
93
Nass
71
Schnee
86
Komfort
92
Geräusch
–
Laufleistung
89
Handling
90

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — besser bei Handling, Komfort und Laufleistung. Wählen Sie den Michelin CrossClimate 2, wenn Ihnen Nass am wichtigsten ist.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

7 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91AV liegt 3 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
90
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
93
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 92 –
Tire Rack Besitzer 94 82
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 86 94
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100
America's Tire Besitzer 98 –

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 12 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
83
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
71
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 84 –
Tire Rack Besitzer 94 72
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 82 71
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100
America's Tire Besitzer 97 –

Schnee

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91AV liegt 4 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
86
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 80 –
Tire Rack Besitzer 88 86
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 85 –
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91AV liegt 15 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
77
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
92
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 73 –
Tire Rack Besitzer 89 76
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 84 94
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100
America's Tire Besitzer 96 –

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
72
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
–
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 72 –
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100
America's Tire Besitzer 92 –

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91AV liegt 7 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
89
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Tire Rack Besitzer 91 80
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 82 90
SimpleTire Besitzer – 100
America's Tire Besitzer 95 –

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar G91AV liegt 16 vorn
A — Michelin CrossClimate 2
74
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
90
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossClimate 2Geolandar G91AV
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 74 90
America's Tire Besitzer 97 –
DriverReviews Besitzer 84 82

Scores im Überblick

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieMichelin CrossClimate 2Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Relativer Score 82 85
Trocken 90 93
Nass 83 71
Schnee 82 86
Komfort 77 92
Geräusch 72 –
Laufleistung 82 89
Handling 74 90

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.

Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Michelin CrossClimate 2

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is widely regarded as a benchmark all-weather tire, offering exceptional snow and ice traction that rivals dedicated winter tires while maintaining respectable dry and wet performance. While most users praise its year-round versatility and comfort, a subset of owners reports concerns regarding wet-weather confidence, increased road noise as the tire wears, and a noticeable impact on fuel efficiency.

Vorteile

  • Outstanding snow and ice traction for an all-season tire
  • Excellent dry road handling and braking performance
  • High levels of ride comfort and noise refinement when new
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • Long-term durability and tread life for many users

Nachteile

  • Noticeable drop in fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or low-rolling-resistance tires
  • Increased road noise and ride stiffness as the tread wears down
  • Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users reporting understeer or lack of confidence
  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Performance degradation in extreme summer heat

Beobachtungen

  • EV and hybrid owners frequently report a 5-7% reduction in range or fuel efficiency due to higher rolling resistance.
  • Users with high-performance or high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Mustang) often find the tire's sidewall and compound too soft for spirited driving, leading to unpredictable handling.
  • Drivers of heavier SUVs and crossovers generally report higher satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle inclement weather compared to lighter passenger cars.
Reifen B Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

The Yokohama Geolandar G91AV receives mixed feedback, often serving as a polarizing original equipment tire for compact SUVs like the Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester. While many users praise its quiet operation, long-term durability, and comfort, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and premature tread wear depending on driving conditions and alignment maintenance.

Vorteile

  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Impressive tread longevity for many long-term users
  • Reliable performance in dry highway and city driving conditions
  • Consistent performance across varying temperature ranges

Nachteile

  • Noticeable lack of grip during wet-weather cornering
  • Reports of premature wear or alignment sensitivity
  • Tendency for wheel spin during acceleration
  • Poor drainage performance in heavy rain

Beobachtungen

  • Toyota RAV4 owners report a wide variance in tread life, ranging from 12,000 miles to over 60,000 miles.
  • Subaru Forester users noted specific issues with lateral sliding and wheel spin, suggesting the tire may struggle with the vehicle's power delivery or chassis dynamics.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Gemischt

Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is largely positive regarding its exceptional snow, ice, and wet weather traction, with many users praising its quiet ride and aggressive look. However, some dissenters point out potential drawbacks such as increased road noise as the tread ages, a minor hit to fuel economy or EV range, and questioned value for users who live in mild climates without winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 Upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

r/crv ·53 Upvotes ·2023-06-23

“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”

r/MachE ·37 Upvotes ·2026-07-23

“PSA: Michelin CrossClimate 2 - They make noise. Recently purchased Michelin Cross Climate 2s for my MachE from Costco. I received a fairly decent price (1,000 for 4) vs local competitors (1,400 for 4). I've seen a lot of people say how great they are, and I thought I'd give them a shot. They look nice. They definitely give it a more 'off-road' look. They also come with a 65,000 mile warranty which they said applied to EVs as well, which is nice as well. They feel great driving. I appreciate their excellent traction and feel secure on turns. I haven't been able to test them on snow yet, but they perform well on wet roads. That being said. They definitely make noise. They make a little at lower, city speeds (~35 mph). They also make a really weird noise at highway speeds (~70 mph+). Neither is so loud or annoying that a little radio can't cover up the sound. Overall, I am very pleased with the tire and the price I received. However, be warned, they do make noise. EDIT: I originally posted this is the Ford Mustang MachE forum and forgot to say that I put them on my MachE. The MachE, being an EV, may be why the noise is more noticeable for me versus others. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·35 Upvotes ·2026-01-18

“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”

Top-Themen
#Snow and ice performance#Wet weather traction#Road noise and ride comfort#Fuel economy and EV range impact#Tread wear and longevity#Price and value comparison

Basierend auf 393 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
KategorieGanzjahresreifen · Premium TouringSommerreifen · Premium Touring
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / CrossoverSUV und 4x4
Profiltiefe9 - 10/32″7,9 mm (10/32″)
UTQG640 B A280 B A
Laufleistungsgarantie97.000 km—
SeitenwandBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max. Druck50 - 51 psi3,5 bar (51 psi)
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Michelin

Yokohama

Sieger: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — besser bei Handling, Komfort und Laufleistung. Wählen Sie den Michelin CrossClimate 2, wenn Ihnen Nass am wichtigsten ist.

Reifen B wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 90 vs 74 bei Handling.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 92 vs 77 bei Komfort.

Reifen A wählen Ihnen ist Sicherheit bei Nässe am wichtigsten

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 83 vs 71 bei Nass.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 89 vs 82 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Reifen B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.