Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 92 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 94 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 86 | 94 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 98 | – |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 94 | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 82 | 71 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 97 | – |
Schnee
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 88 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | – |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 73 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 89 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 84 | 94 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 96 | – |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 72 | – |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 92 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 91 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 82 | 90 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 100 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 95 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | CrossClimate 2 | Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 74 | 90 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | 97 | – |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 84 | 82 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 82 | 85 |
| Trocken | 90 | 93 |
| Nass | 83 | 71 |
| Schnee | 82 | 86 |
| Komfort | 77 | 92 |
| Geräusch | 72 | – |
| Laufleistung | 82 | 89 |
| Handling | 74 | 90 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is widely regarded as a benchmark all-weather tire, offering exceptional snow and ice traction that rivals dedicated winter tires while maintaining respectable dry and wet performance. While most users praise its year-round versatility and comfort, a subset of owners reports concerns regarding wet-weather confidence, increased road noise as the tire wears, and a noticeable impact on fuel efficiency.
Vorteile
- Outstanding snow and ice traction for an all-season tire
- Excellent dry road handling and braking performance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise refinement when new
- Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Long-term durability and tread life for many users
Nachteile
- Noticeable drop in fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or low-rolling-resistance tires
- Increased road noise and ride stiffness as the tread wears down
- Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users reporting understeer or lack of confidence
- Higher price point compared to competitors
- Performance degradation in extreme summer heat
Beobachtungen
- EV and hybrid owners frequently report a 5-7% reduction in range or fuel efficiency due to higher rolling resistance.
- Users with high-performance or high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Mustang) often find the tire's sidewall and compound too soft for spirited driving, leading to unpredictable handling.
- Drivers of heavier SUVs and crossovers generally report higher satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle inclement weather compared to lighter passenger cars.
The Yokohama Geolandar G91AV receives mixed feedback, often serving as a polarizing original equipment tire for compact SUVs like the Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester. While many users praise its quiet operation, long-term durability, and comfort, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and premature tread wear depending on driving conditions and alignment maintenance.
Vorteile
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Impressive tread longevity for many long-term users
- Reliable performance in dry highway and city driving conditions
- Consistent performance across varying temperature ranges
Nachteile
- Noticeable lack of grip during wet-weather cornering
- Reports of premature wear or alignment sensitivity
- Tendency for wheel spin during acceleration
- Poor drainage performance in heavy rain
Beobachtungen
- Toyota RAV4 owners report a wide variance in tread life, ranging from 12,000 miles to over 60,000 miles.
- Subaru Forester users noted specific issues with lateral sliding and wheel spin, suggesting the tire may struggle with the vehicle's power delivery or chassis dynamics.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is largely positive regarding its exceptional snow, ice, and wet weather traction, with many users praising its quiet ride and aggressive look. However, some dissenters point out potential drawbacks such as increased road noise as the tread ages, a minor hit to fuel economy or EV range, and questioned value for users who live in mild climates without winter weather.
“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”
“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”
“PSA: Michelin CrossClimate 2 - They make noise. Recently purchased Michelin Cross Climate 2s for my MachE from Costco. I received a fairly decent price (1,000 for 4) vs local competitors (1,400 for 4). I've seen a lot of people say how great they are, and I thought I'd give them a shot. They look nice. They definitely give it a more 'off-road' look. They also come with a 65,000 mile warranty which they said applied to EVs as well, which is nice as well. They feel great driving. I appreciate their excellent traction and feel secure on turns. I haven't been able to test them on snow yet, but they perform well on wet roads. That being said. They definitely make noise. They make a little at lower, city speeds (~35 mph). They also make a really weird noise at highway speeds (~70 mph+). Neither is so loud or annoying that a little radio can't cover up the sound. Overall, I am very pleased with the tire and the price I received. However, be warned, they do make noise. EDIT: I originally posted this is the Ford Mustang MachE forum and forgot to say that I put them on my MachE. The MachE, being an EV, may be why the noise is more noticeable for me versus others. Read more”
“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”
Basierend auf 393 Community-Beiträgen
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Ganzjahresreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV und 4x4 |
| Profiltiefe | 9 - 10/32″ | 7,9 mm (10/32″) |
| UTQG | 640 B A | 280 B A |
| Laufleistungsgarantie | 97.000 km | — |
| Seitenwand | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | 50 - 51 psi | 3,5 bar (51 psi) |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Michelin
Yokohama
Sieger: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — besser bei Handling, Komfort und Laufleistung. Wählen Sie den Michelin CrossClimate 2, wenn Ihnen Nass am wichtigsten ist.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 90 vs 74 bei Handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 92 vs 77 bei Komfort.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 83 vs 71 bei Nass.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV erreicht 89 vs 82 bei Laufleistung.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.