Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Azenis FK510 führt, 77–74 Knapper Vorsprung
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 74 · 4 Tests Besitzer 69 · 176 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 20 im 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (bremsen nass)
“Mount all 4 tires Bridgestone Potenza S001 215/45R20 on i3s stock rims 5.5” front 15mm spacers and 6.5” rear After much convincing I have mounted all four tires of the same size purchased on TireRack for $83 each on i3s stock staggered rims. Smooth and stable. Looking gooddddddd!”
Tests 72 · 29 Tests Besitzer 80 · 384 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 8 im 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test (subj. handling nass)
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 74 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 88 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 83 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | 97 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 93% | 98% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 97% |
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 91 | 83 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 80 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 69 | 88 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | 91 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 100% | 80% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 94% |
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 44 | 48 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 80 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 60 | 77 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | 95 |
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 85 | 60 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | 88 |
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 62 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 67 | 71 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | 80 |
| Quelle | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 74 | 81 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 84 | 86 |
| Kategorie | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 74 | 77 |
| Trocken | 84 | 80 |
| Nass | 83 | 85 |
| Komfort | 51 | 61 |
| Geräusch | 85 | 76 |
| Laufleistung | 67 | 75 |
| Handling | 74 | 81 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Potenza S001
Azenis FK510
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Potenza S001 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 93% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test | −5,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +0,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 100% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 84% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +15,6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 100% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +1,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 83% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 73% #5/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +10,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Sonstige | 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 100% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 71% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +28,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 62% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 70% #14/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −7,6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 33% #3/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 13% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | +20,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 93% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #6/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | −1,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 78% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | −7,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +10,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | −22,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #4/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +20,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 94% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 94% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | +0,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is divided, with some users praising their dry grip and stability, while many others criticize their rapid wear, stiffness (especially run-flat variants), noise, and cracking issues. Owners frequently compare them unfavorably to alternatives like Michelin or Pirelli, though budget-friendly deals tend to draw occasional interest.
“Replacing Bridgestone Potenza s001 RunFlats with Primacy 5 vs. PS5. Suggestions? I drive a VW Jetta which only has 160 Hp. I do occasionally really enjoy some spirited driving or taking aggressive turns. My considerations are that I do really care about Comfort and road noise and so that leads me towards the Primacy 5. At the same time, I don't think the power of my car justifies the PS5. My question is basically, I've online that for runflats to be runflats they have really stiff sidewalls, which might be contributing to the current feel of my car and I wonder if, even though everything else about the Potenza s001 is quite worse compared to the Primacy 5, I wonder if I will miss the stiff sidewall? And just because of that should I consider the PS5?”
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
“I put the Potenza S001 tires on the rear of my i3s with that Tire Rack deal but I didn't think they would fit on the 5.5 inch rims. I think the rears are 6.0".”
Basierend auf 16 Community-Beiträgen
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Max Performance | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 15 | 68 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Profiltiefe | 6,4 mm (8/32″) | 7,9 mm (10/32″) |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 300 A A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | 3,4 bar (50 psi) |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Falken Azenis FK510
Sieger: Falken Azenis FK510 — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Wählen Sie den Bridgestone Potenza S001, wenn Ihnen Geräusch und Trocken am wichtigsten sind.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 61 vs 51 bei Komfort.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 erreicht 85 vs 76 bei Geräusch.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 75 vs 67 bei Laufleistung.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 81 vs 74 bei Handling.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.
