Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 91 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 84 | 90 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 90 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 95 |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 78 | 86 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 90 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 85 |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 64 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 73 | 71 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 90 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 93 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 84 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 90 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 86 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 93 | 61 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | – | 70 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 81 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | g-Force Profiler | Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 70 | 89 |
| America's Tire Besitzer | – | 90 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | – | 82 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Bridgestone Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 71 | 79 |
| Trocken | 90 | 91 |
| Nass | 58 | 86 |
| Komfort | 74 | 68 |
| Geräusch | – | 85 |
| Laufleistung | 72 | 64 |
| Handling | 70 | 89 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force series, particularly the Rival S 1.5, is widely regarded as a top-tier, competition-focused 200-treadwear tire that excels in autocross and track environments. While users praise its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and predictable handling, it is generally considered a specialized tool that requires heat to perform optimally and can be noisy or uncomfortable for daily street use.
Vorteile
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- Rapid warm-up time, ideal for autocross
- Predictable handling and driver feedback at the limit
- Competitive tread life compared to other extreme performance tires
- Available in a wide range of sizes, including large fitments for high-performance vehicles
Nachteile
- Poor performance and safety in wet or cold conditions
- High noise levels during street driving
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose grip during extended track sessions if overheated
- Stiff ride quality that sacrifices comfort for performance
Beobachtungen
- Users with heavy vehicles (e.g., 3800 lbs+) report good performance but note the tires can get greasy during long sprint sessions.
- Miata and other lightweight sports car owners frequently cite these as a benchmark for autocross, noting they are significantly more durable than competing tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R.
- Staggered fitments are often used to balance handling characteristics, particularly on rear-wheel-drive platforms to prevent oversteer.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport is widely regarded as a top-tier Ultra-High Performance tire that excels in steering precision, dry handling, and wet-weather confidence. While it is frequently praised for its near-track-level grip and direct feedback, users consistently note that these performance benefits come at the cost of rapid tread wear and increased road noise. It is best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize driving dynamics over longevity and comfort.
Vorteile
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Sharp, telepathic steering response and feedback
- High-speed stability and confidence-inspiring handling
- Excellent rim protection due to robust sidewall construction
Nachteile
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under spirited driving
- High levels of road noise
- Firm ride quality that transmits road imperfections
- Performance drop-off in cold temperatures
Beobachtungen
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and high-torque sedans, report significantly accelerated tread wear compared to lighter hatchbacks.
- The tire's stiff sidewall provides excellent rim protection but is noted to be less compliant on rough road surfaces, leading to a harsher ride in some applications.
- Users with performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Porsche, Golf R) report that the tire requires a brief warm-up period to reach its full grip potential.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and its variants is generally mixed, praising their exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering response, and sharp handling while raising concerns about fuel economy/rolling resistance, tire wear, and occasional durability issues. The newly introduced Potenza Sport AS and Evo models are drawing positive initial comparisons against major competitors like Michelin and Continental, specifically addressing previous generation shortcomings.
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo - quick initial review - 250 miles Very early impression on this newly released update, used as a track tyre on my modded MX-5 done about 50 laps at Bedford Autodrome GT layout, 8-15C air temp, as well as to and from the track. Fun track tyres, great handling feedback and direct steering feel, plenty of grip when push and stable through corner. Confident under heavy braking. Track performance much improved overall compared to the PS4 previously which was quite snappy at limit. Not driven in the wet yet so cannot comment on wet performance. Not driven enough to comment on wear but seems decent after 50 laps/250 miles Road noise is louder, and side wall is stiffer compared to PS4, maybe by ~10%. Would recommend, especially if you can get them on a deal. I paid £330 for 4 corners fitted. Size was 225/45/17. The side wall is quite pretty too if you care for this. Read more”
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Anybody running potenza sports? My rear right tire inside sidewall got shredded suddenly at highway speed (85+ mph). Fortunately I did not lose control and was able to move the car to a nearby school parking lot with a spare. Ordered a set of DWS06+ and they should be delivered tomorrow. The tires are a little more than 4 years old and had about 12k miles on them. Kind of bummed at the situation, but this could’ve been much worse. Are potenza sports generally that bad? Read more”
“Bridgestone potenza sport after 2 years Lots of haircracks in my potenza sports that I bought 2 years ago. The DOT is week 16 of 2021. Is this normal? Driven approximately 25000 kms with these tyres. Only the rear tyres show these marks is this normal? The fronts of the same age and kms look fine Size: 245/35/18 Read more”
“I’ve been running the Potenza Sport for the past 2 years during the warm months here in CO on my G37, and they’ve been great. In my experience they worsen my mpg by 3 mpg (depends how I’m driving) and they’ve worn extremely well considering I have -2.5 degrees of camber. I will say the best part is the steering response, it makes my heavy G37 feel way lighter with how good the steering response is and I feel way more confident under braking and cornering in the canyons.”
Basierend auf 33 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Bridgestone Potenza Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · High Performance | Sommerreifen · Max Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | — | 71 |
| Felgendurchmesser | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Profiltiefe | — | 7 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 320 A - AA A |
| Seitenwand | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max. Druck | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
BFGoodrich
Bridgestone
Sieger: Bridgestone Potenza Sport — besser bei Nass und Handling. Wählen Sie den BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler, wenn Ihnen Laufleistung und Komfort am wichtigsten sind.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport erreicht 86 vs 58 bei Nass.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport erreicht 89 vs 70 bei Handling.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler erreicht 72 vs 64 bei Laufleistung.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler erreicht 74 vs 68 bei Komfort.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.