Direktvergleich Aktualisiert

Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — im Vergleich

Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.

Ecsta PA51 liegt vorn, 89–82

Ihre Größe angeben für genaue Treffer
/R

Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Reifen AKumho

Ecsta PA51

Ganzjahresreifen · Ultra High Performance

Tests – · noch keine Besitzer 91 · 108 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 7 von 19 im 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (gesamtplatzierung)

Reifen BFirestone

Firehawk Indy 500

Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance

Tests – · noch keine Besitzer 87 · 1.452 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 6 von 22 im 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

Kategorie für Kategorie

Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.

  1. 94

    Trocken

    Ecsta PA51 +1
    93
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tire Rack Besitzer8993
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer7584
    SimpleTire Besitzer9896
    America's Tire Besitzer94–
  2. 89

    Nass

    Ecsta PA51 +5
    84
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tire Rack Besitzer8484
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer5869
    SimpleTire Besitzer9885
    America's Tire Besitzer89–
  3. 79

    Schnee

    Ecsta PA51 +16
    63
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tire Rack Besitzer63–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer60–
    SimpleTire Besitzer8863
  4. 91

    Komfort

    Ecsta PA51 +6
    85
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tire Rack Besitzer8285
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer6375
    SimpleTire Besitzer9391
    America's Tire Besitzer92–
  5. 90

    Geräusch

    Ecsta PA51 +3
    87
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    SimpleTire Besitzer9687
    America's Tire Besitzer89–
  6. 90

    Laufleistung

    Ecsta PA51 +9
    81
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tire Rack Besitzer7981
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer8565
    SimpleTire Besitzer9486
    America's Tire Besitzer90–
  7. 91

    Handling

    Ecsta PA51 +8
    83
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer7583
    America's Tire Besitzer92–
Scores im Überblick
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieKumho Ecsta PA51Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Relativer Score 89 82
Trocken 94 93
Nass 89 84
Schnee 79 63
Komfort 91 85
Geräusch 90 87
Laufleistung 90 81
Handling 91 83

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Ecsta PA51

Firehawk Indy 500

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategorieEcsta PA51Firehawk Indy 500ΔBeide?
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Sonstige 67% #11/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires +5,1 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires 62% #9/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires +4,8 Verschiedene Tests

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Ecsta PA51

Vorteile

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality

Nachteile

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Alle Besitzer-Themen im Ecsta PA51-Test

Reifen B Firehawk Indy 500

Vorteile

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Aggressive, sporty tread design

Nachteile

  • Rapid tread wear, especially with aggressive driving
  • Reduced hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain or deep standing water
  • Poor performance and potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
Alle Besitzer-Themen im Firehawk Indy 500-Test

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.

Reifen B

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positiv

Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.

r/MINI ·20 Upvotes ·2025-05-02

“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”

r/Mustang ·7 Upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/S2000 ·4 Upvotes ·2025-06-04

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”

Top-Themen
#Value and Pricing#Dry and Wet Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Sidewall Response and Feel#Comparison to Premium Brands

Basierend auf 27 Community-Beiträgen

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
KategorieGanzjahresreifen · Ultra High PerformanceSommerreifen · Ultra High Performance
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Verfügbare Größen1347
Felgendurchmesser16″ – 19″16″ – 20″
Profiltiefe8,3 mm (10.5/32″)9 - 10/32″
UTQG500 A A340 A A
Laufleistungsgarantie72.000 km—
SeitenwandBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max. Druck3,5 bar (51 psi)50 - 51 psi

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Kumho Ecsta PA51

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Sieger: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — besser bei Schnee, Laufleistung und Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.

Reifen A wählen Sie fahren durch schneereiche Winter

Kumho Ecsta PA51 erreicht 79 vs 63 bei Schnee.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Kumho Ecsta PA51 erreicht 90 vs 81 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen A wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Kumho Ecsta PA51 erreicht 91 vs 83 bei Handling.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Kumho Ecsta PA51 erreicht 91 vs 85 bei Komfort.

Reifen A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Reifen B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.

89

Führt

Ecsta PA51

Amazon