Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 89 | 77 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 90 | 95 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 100% | 92% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 97% | 98% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 87 | 69 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 87 | 89 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 96% | 88% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 86% | 98% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 97% | 96% |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 83 | 45 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 78 | 72 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 35 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 74 | 86 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Pilot Sport 4 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 84 | 91 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 90 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 89 | 74 |
| Trocken | 92 | 84 |
| Nass | 89 | 77 |
| Komfort | 87 | 56 |
| Geräusch | 81 | 35 |
| Laufleistung | 88 | 86 |
| Handling | 94 | 91 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 93% #3/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 85% #8/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +7.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 100% #3/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 92% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +8.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 97% #2/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | -0.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 83% #9/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 77% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +6.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 97% #5/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 95% #1/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +2.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 77% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | -19.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 74% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 62% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +12.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 100% #1/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test | 14% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +85.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #8/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +20.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 90% #3/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 75% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +15 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #8/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 96% #3/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 88% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +8.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 86% #4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | -12.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 97% #6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 96% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +0.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is widely regarded as a premier high-performance summer tire, praised for its exceptional wet-weather traction and balanced daily-driving characteristics. While many users report a significant improvement in ride quality and noise levels compared to OEM run-flats or older performance tires, some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can feel less precise or 'darty' during aggressive cornering compared to dedicated track-focused rubber.
Vorteile
- Class-leading wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Excellent balance of comfort and road noise reduction for a performance tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Strong dry-weather traction and braking performance
- Significant upgrade over OEM run-flat tires in terms of ride quality
Nachteile
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a less 'sharp' or 'darty' steering feel
- Tread wear can be rapid, particularly with spirited driving or on high-torque vehicles
- Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth decreases
- Higher price point compared to many competitors
- Some reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
Beobachtungen
- Tesla and EV owners frequently report a measurable decrease in range due to higher rolling resistance compared to OEM 'eco' tires.
- Users with heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., tuned sedans, performance wagons) often praise the tire's ability to put power down, though this comes at the cost of faster rear-tire wear.
- Drivers switching from run-flat tires on luxury vehicles (BMW, Audi, Mercedes) consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and cabin noise.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Vorteile
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Nachteile
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Beobachtungen
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (and its variants) is widely praised by the community as a massive upgrade over stock run-flats and budget tires, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and improved ride comfort. While users frequently note trade-offs in tread life due to the softer rubber compound, and higher pricing, it remains a top-tier recommendation for spirited street driving and performance cars.
“Surprised by Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires - 2024 M440i Hey, BMW community. A year ago, I was lucky enough to order a 2024 M440i GC Xdrive. Spent hours driving different BMW's, tweaking my order sheet before my allocation was filled. Got the adaptive suspension, with 19's on Pirelli run-flats. After a few months, my San Remo GC was delivered. GREAT car. Now with ~17k miles, it was time for a routine service. And, apparently, new rear tires. Decided to just replace them all at the dealer. Went with what they recommended; Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (Star marked). What an upgrade! Steering feel, precision, comfort AND quiet. Anyone on the fence about the Pilot Sport 4 - highly recommended. Read more”
“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”
“I just installed A/S PS4 from Michelin on my BRZ recently & man they are so nice. How quiet it is, is wow, night and day. They handle quite nice except when it's still cold (sub 40F) on highway, traction control triggers but it may bc I'm lowered and yet to do my alignment. I don't know compared to stock, I was on Falken prior. I am using different tire set-up then stock however. I have 245/35 at the front and 265/35 in rear. My only regret is not going up to 40 on the sidewall for more meat. This is on 18" wheels.”
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Basierend auf 117 Community-Beiträgen
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Max Performance | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Michelin
Yokohama
Sieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — besser bei Geräusch, Komfort und Nass. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 81 vs 35 bei Geräusch.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 87 vs 56 bei Komfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 89 vs 77 bei Nass.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 92 vs 84 bei Trocken.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.