Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
76/100
25 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
80/100
384 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
80
Nass
85
Komfort
62
Geräusch
84
Laufleistung
75
Handling
81

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Michelin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Sommerreifen · Max Performance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
92/100
17 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
92/100
2.273 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
92
Nass
89
Komfort
87
Geräusch
81
Laufleistung
88
Handling
94

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Wählen Sie den Falken Azenis FK510, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

6 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 liegt 12 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 74 89
Tire Rack Besitzer 89 93
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 90
SimpleTire Besitzer 97
Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) 92% 98%
Handling trocken (% vom Besten) 97% 100%

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 liegt 4 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
89
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 84 87
Tire Rack Besitzer 86 87
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 87
SimpleTire Besitzer 91
Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) 87% 93%
Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) 99% 86%
Handling nass (% vom Besten) 97% 97%

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 liegt 25 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 49 83
Tire Rack Besitzer 83 83
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 77 78
SimpleTire Besitzer 95

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 liegt 3 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
81
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 73 74
SimpleTire Besitzer 88

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 liegt 13 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
88
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Tire Rack Besitzer 77 67
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 71 74
SimpleTire Besitzer 80

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 liegt 13 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4
94
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 81 84
DriverReviews Besitzer 86 90

Scores im Überblick

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieFalken Azenis FK510Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relativer Score 78 89
Trocken 80 92
Nass 85 89
Komfort 62 87
Geräusch 84 81
Laufleistung 75 88
Handling 81 94

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

Testdaten

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategorieReifen AReifen BΔBeide?
Aquaplaning quer Kurve 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test -0.3 Gleicher Test
Bremsen trocken Trocken 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 98% #3/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test -6.5 Verschiedene Tests
Handling trocken Trocken 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test -2.7 Verschiedene Tests
Rollwiderstand Effizienz 90% #4/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test -8.5 Verschiedene Tests
Geräusch Sonstige 99% #4/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test +0.5 Verschiedene Tests
Preis Sonstige 63% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 100% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test -36.5 Verschiedene Tests
Preis-Leistung Sonstige 59% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -40.5 Gleicher Test
Verschleiß Sonstige 73% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 96% #5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -23.8 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 14% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test 25% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test -10.7 Verschiedene Tests
Aquaplaning längs Geradeaus 98% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 96% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test +2.4 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Komfort Subjektiv 100% #1/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 78% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test +22.2 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling trocken Subjektiv 80% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 90% #2/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test -10 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling nass Subjektiv 80% #11/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test -20 Gleicher Test
Gesamtkosten Gesamt 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #13/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0 Gleicher Test
Bremsen nass Nass 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 93% #4/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test -5.8 Gleicher Test
Kreisbahn nass Nass 99% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 86% #4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test +13.4 Verschiedene Tests
Handling nass Nass 97% #7/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 97% #6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 0 Verschiedene Tests
Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Vorteile

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Nachteile

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Beobachtungen

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Reifen B Michelin Pilot Sport 4

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is widely regarded as a premier high-performance summer tire, praised for its exceptional wet-weather traction and balanced daily-driving characteristics. While many users report a significant improvement in ride quality and noise levels compared to OEM run-flats or older performance tires, some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can feel less precise or 'darty' during aggressive cornering compared to dedicated track-focused rubber.

Vorteile

  • Class-leading wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Excellent balance of comfort and road noise reduction for a performance tire
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • Strong dry-weather traction and braking performance
  • Significant upgrade over OEM run-flat tires in terms of ride quality

Nachteile

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a less 'sharp' or 'darty' steering feel
  • Tread wear can be rapid, particularly with spirited driving or on high-torque vehicles
  • Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth decreases
  • Higher price point compared to many competitors
  • Some reports of increased road noise as the tire ages

Beobachtungen

  • Tesla and EV owners frequently report a measurable decrease in range due to higher rolling resistance compared to OEM 'eco' tires.
  • Users with heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., tuned sedans, performance wagons) often praise the tire's ability to put power down, though this comes at the cost of faster rear-tire wear.
  • Drivers switching from run-flat tires on luxury vehicles (BMW, Audi, Mercedes) consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and cabin noise.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Falken Azenis FK510

Gemischt

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 Upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 Upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 Upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 Upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top-Themen
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positiv

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (and its variants) is widely praised by the community as a massive upgrade over stock run-flats and budget tires, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and improved ride comfort. While users frequently note trade-offs in tread life due to the softer rubber compound, and higher pricing, it remains a top-tier recommendation for spirited street driving and performance cars.

r/BMW ·26 Upvotes ·2024-09-23

“Surprised by Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires - 2024 M440i Hey, BMW community. A year ago, I was lucky enough to order a 2024 M440i GC Xdrive. Spent hours driving different BMW's, tweaking my order sheet before my allocation was filled. Got the adaptive suspension, with 19's on Pirelli run-flats. After a few months, my San Remo GC was delivered. GREAT car. Now with ~17k miles, it was time for a routine service. And, apparently, new rear tires. Decided to just replace them all at the dealer. Went with what they recommended; Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (Star marked). What an upgrade! Steering feel, precision, comfort AND quiet. Anyone on the fence about the Pilot Sport 4 - highly recommended. Read more”

r/BoltEV ·5 Upvotes ·2026-04-29

“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”

r/ft86 ·3 Upvotes ·2022-01-09

“I just installed A/S PS4 from Michelin on my BRZ recently & man they are so nice. How quiet it is, is wow, night and day. They handle quite nice except when it's still cold (sub 40F) on highway, traction control triggers but it may bc I'm lowered and yet to do my alignment. I don't know compared to stock, I was on Falken prior. I am using different tire set-up then stock however. I have 245/35 at the front and 265/35 in rear. My only regret is not going up to 40 on the sidewall for more meat. This is on 18" wheels.”

r/tires ·2 Upvotes ·2026-07-28

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Top-Themen
#grip and handling performance#ride quality and comfort#tread wear and lifespan#wet weather capability#comparison to runflats#noise levels#temperature limits and cold weather

Basierend auf 117 Community-Beiträgen

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
KategorieSommerreifen · Ultra High PerformanceSommerreifen · Max Performance
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Verfügbare Größen68
Felgendurchmesser17″ – 22″
Profiltiefe7,9 mm (10/32″)
UTQG300 A A
SeitenwandBlackwall
Max. Druck3,4 bar (50 psi)
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Falken

Michelin

Sieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Wählen Sie den Falken Azenis FK510, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 87 vs 62 bei Komfort.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 88 vs 75 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen B wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 94 vs 81 bei Handling.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen maximalen Grip auf trockener Straße

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 erreicht 92 vs 80 bei Trocken.

Reifen A · Falken Azenis FK510
Reifen B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.