Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 85 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 93 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 97 | – |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 92% | 99% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 97% | 98% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 89 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 90 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 91 | – |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 87% | 93% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 92% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 97% | 92% |
Schnee
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 75 | – |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 49 | 84 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 80 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 95 | – |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 73 | 72 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 88 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 79 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 88 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | 88 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Falken Azenis FK510 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 78 | 83 |
| Trocken | 80 | 88 |
| Nass | 85 | 90 |
| Schnee | – | 52 |
| Komfort | 62 | 82 |
| Geräusch | 84 | 72 |
| Laufleistung | 75 | 79 |
| Handling | 81 | 88 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | -0.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -7.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #8/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | -0.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 81% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | -16.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 99% #5/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -0.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 77% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test | -16.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 71% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 78% #13/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -6.8 | Gleicher Test |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 73% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -27.3 | Gleicher Test |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 13% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | -87.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 97% #4/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test | -2.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 60% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 89% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | -28.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 80% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 91% #8/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -11.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 80% #11/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs SuperSport vs SuperSport R | -20 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #12/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Gleicher Test |
| Tyre Weight | Tyre | 93% #5/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | -6.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 93% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -6.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | +7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 97% #7/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | 92% #2/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | +4.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable handling characteristics
Nachteile
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
- Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
- Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down
Beobachtungen
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
- Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Nachteile
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Beobachtungen
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Max Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 68 | 16 |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 22″ | 18″ – 21″ |
| Profiltiefe | 7,9 mm (10/32″) | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | 50 - 51 psi |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Falken
Goodyear
Sieger: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — besser bei Komfort, Trocken und Handling. Wählen Sie den Falken Azenis FK510, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 erreicht 82 vs 62 bei Komfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 84 vs 72 bei Geräusch.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 erreicht 88 vs 80 bei Trocken.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 erreicht 88 vs 81 bei Handling.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.