Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Reifen A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
76/100
25 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
80/100
384 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
80
Nass
85
Komfort
62
Geräusch
84
Laufleistung
75
Handling
81

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Michelin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Sommerreifen · Max Performance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
94/100
28 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
93/100
2.091 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
91
Nass
87
Komfort
86
Geräusch
84
Laufleistung
90
Handling
95

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

6 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S liegt 11 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
91
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 74 87
Tire Rack Besitzer 89 95
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 92
SimpleTire Besitzer 97
Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) 97% 92%
Handling trocken (% vom Besten) 98% 96%

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S liegt 2 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 84 83
Tire Rack Besitzer 86 88
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 88 87
SimpleTire Besitzer 91
Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) 87% 95%
Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) 93% 87%
Handling nass (% vom Besten) 96% 97%

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S liegt 24 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
86
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 49 82
Tire Rack Besitzer 83 87
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 77 84
SimpleTire Besitzer 95

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) 73 78
SimpleTire Besitzer 88

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S liegt 15 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
90
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire Rack Besitzer 77 80
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 71 80
SimpleTire Besitzer 80

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S liegt 14 vorn
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95
Warum dieser Score
QuelleAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 81 86
DriverReviews Besitzer 86 92

Scores im Überblick

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieFalken Azenis FK510Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Relativer Score 78 89
Trocken 80 91
Nass 85 87
Komfort 62 86
Geräusch 84 84
Laufleistung 75 90
Handling 81 95

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

Testdaten

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategorieReifen AReifen BΔBeide?
Aquaplaning quer Kurve 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 91% #6/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test +8.8 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen trocken Trocken 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 92% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test +5 Verschiedene Tests
Handling trocken Trocken 98% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test +2 Verschiedene Tests
Rollwiderstand Effizienz 90% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test 93% #2/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test -3.5 Verschiedene Tests
Geräusch Sonstige 96% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test -1.7 Verschiedene Tests
Preis Sonstige 86% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test -14 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 11% #9/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test 17% #6/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test -5.6 Verschiedene Tests
Aquaplaning längs Geradeaus 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 98% #3/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test -3.1 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Komfort Subjektiv 78% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test -12.2 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling trocken Subjektiv 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test -20 Verschiedene Tests
Subj. Handling nass Subjektiv 78% #3/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 78% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test -0.2 Verschiedene Tests
Tyre Weight Tyre 93% #5/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test -5.8 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen nass Nass 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 95% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test -7.6 Verschiedene Tests
Kreisbahn nass Nass 93% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 87% #7/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test +5.4 Verschiedene Tests
Handling nass Nass 96% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 97% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test -1.8 Verschiedene Tests
Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Vorteile

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Nachteile

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Beobachtungen

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Reifen B Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, consistently praised for its exceptional wet and dry grip, confidence-inspiring handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat alternatives. While most users laud its versatility and safety, some enthusiasts note that its relatively soft sidewalls can result in slightly less steering precision or feedback compared to more track-focused or stiffer-walled competitors.

Vorteile

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High levels of ride comfort and reduced road noise
  • Predictable handling and stability at high speeds
  • Excellent rim protection design
  • Strong longevity for a high-performance tire

Nachteile

  • Soft sidewalls can feel vague or sluggish during aggressive steering inputs
  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Performance can degrade significantly as the tread wears down
  • Reports of sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
  • Not suitable for cold weather or snow

Beobachtungen

  • Users transitioning from OEM run-flat tires on luxury and performance vehicles (e.g., BMW, Mercedes, Tesla) report a transformative improvement in ride quality and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently highlight the tire's ability to put power down effectively, though some note faster wear on rear axles.
  • Some users with heavy vehicles or specific performance setups noted that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during rapid direction changes.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Falken Azenis FK510

Gemischt

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 Upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 Upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 Upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 Upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top-Themen
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Positiv

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely praised by the community as a premier max performance summer tire, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and refined road manners for daily driving and spirited street use. While some users note higher pricing and relatively quick wear on heavier vehicles or hot tracks, it remains a benchmark choice that many enthusiasts gladly return to despite alternatives like Continental or Kumho.

r/CarTrackDays ·97 Upvotes ·2026-05-04

“Tire condition after 1st track day. PS4s on a GR86 First 2 pics are drivers front, rest pass front. This was at CMP, temps mid 70s, mostly cloudy. Lowered TP to 31psi. Highest I saw on track was 36 psi. The driver side l thought looked good, but passengers side inner looks like they melted. Is this track rubber I picked up or due to mostly turning right on this clockwise circuit?? Also was pleasantly surprised to only have used 1/16 of tread depth after 110 minutes on track. Given what I have read, thought the ps4s would be all used up. Maybe on a hot track surface they would have been eaten up. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·41 Upvotes ·2026-03-17

“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”

r/cars ·4 Upvotes ·2018-08-21

“I’ll say this. Going from the Pilot Super Sport to the Pilot Sport 4 S of the same size, I’m disappointed in the soft sidewall of the 4 S. This is an 8.5” wide wheel with 235/40/18 tires. The left-right fast slalom action got a bit mushy like the weight transfer was slowed down when I switched to the 4 S. I think a shorter sidewall 4 S would perform better in this way, or the same tire on a 9” wide wheel too. That said, the dry and wet grip is exceptional. To save money, I’d recommend the Continental ExtremeContact Sport.”

r/ft86 ·2 Upvotes ·2023-06-01

“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”

Top-Themen
#Dry and Wet Grip#Tread Life and Wear#Price vs Value#Track Performance Limits#Daily Comfort and Noise#Alternatives Comparison

Basierend auf 104 Community-Beiträgen

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
KategorieSommerreifen · Ultra High PerformanceSommerreifen · Max Performance
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Verfügbare Größen68
Felgendurchmesser17″ – 22″
Profiltiefe7,9 mm (10/32″)
UTQG300 A A
SeitenwandBlackwall
Max. Druck3,4 bar (50 psi)
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Falken

Michelin

Sieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Handling. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S erreicht 86 vs 62 bei Komfort.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S erreicht 90 vs 75 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen B wählen Sie mögen präzises, direktes Handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S erreicht 95 vs 81 bei Handling.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen maximalen Grip auf trockener Straße

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S erreicht 91 vs 80 bei Trocken.

Reifen A · Falken Azenis FK510
Reifen B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.