Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 99 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 89 | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 94 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 97 | – |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 97% | 100% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 96% | 100% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 88 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 86 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 83 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 91 | – |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 87% | 94% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 96% | 97% |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 49 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 81 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 95 | – |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 73 | – |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 88 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 77 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 82 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 86 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | 88 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Falken Azenis FK510 | Michelin Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 78 | 92 |
| Trocken | 80 | 98 |
| Nass | 85 | 90 |
| Komfort | 62 | 93 |
| Geräusch | 84 | 92 |
| Laufleistung | 75 | 90 |
| Handling | 81 | 95 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/3 · OE vs Aftermarket - Is the tyre your vehicle came with always the best tyre? | -3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 96% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 100% #2/3 · OE vs Aftermarket - Is the tyre your vehicle came with always the best tyre? | -3.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 17% #6/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 50% #2/3 · OE vs Aftermarket - Is the tyre your vehicle came with always the best tyre? | -33.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 94% #2/3 · OE vs Aftermarket - Is the tyre your vehicle came with always the best tyre? | -7.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 96% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 97% #2/3 · OE vs Aftermarket - Is the tyre your vehicle came with always the best tyre? | -1.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable handling characteristics
Nachteile
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
- Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
- Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down
Beobachtungen
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
- Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, praised for its exceptional dry grip, steering precision, and confidence-inspiring handling. While it excels in warm, spirited driving conditions, users note that its performance diminishes significantly in cold temperatures or heavy standing water, and some report increased road noise compared to touring-oriented tires.
Vorteile
- Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
- High level of steering feedback and responsiveness
- Strong wet weather performance for a summer-focused tire
- Impressive tread life relative to its performance category
- Significant ride quality improvement over OEM run-flat tires
Nachteile
- Noticeable loss of grip in cold temperatures (below 10-15°C)
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Higher price point compared to competitors
- Reduced performance in standing water as tread depth decreases
Beobachtungen
- Users transitioning from factory run-flat tires on BMW and other luxury vehicles report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- High-horsepower vehicle owners note that while the tire offers excellent grip, it can still struggle to put power down in cold or damp conditions.
- Some users on 18-inch and smaller setups report that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on uneven or broken road surfaces.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
Michelin Pilot Super Sport
The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the automotive community for its exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and overall performance as a high-performance summer tire. While some users note limitations in cold or snowy weather and occasional concerns regarding tread life or aging cracks, most enthusiasts consider them a benchmark daily driver and street performance tire.
“They weren't kidding about Michelin Pilot Super Sports. They're way grippier than the Continental ExtremeContact DW tires that were rated #2 after the Super Sports on tirerack.com. I had a 2009 GTI with 225 width ExtremeContacts and now I have a 2016 with 235 width Super Sports. The difference is not subtle. Now, both have been gently upgraded to the Pilot Sport 4 S, and the ExtremeContact Sport. The only two max performance summer tires with a tread life warranty. 30k miles on square stance cars where you rotate them properly, and 15k on staggered.”
“12k on two consecutive sets of PSS. Stage 2 MK6 (285whp/325wtq), drive fairly aggressively, an odd track day or two here and there, full suspension but run aggressive alignment settings. No abnormaly quick wear in any one spot, they just look like racing slicks when I’m done. If you can afford it, they are well worth the $$. Other tires may come close in performance, but for daily use, can’t beat the comfort of the PSS”
“As someone who lapped the car until I destroyed the OEM tires, and then lapped a set of PSS until I destroyed those too. The PSS are stickier than stock for sure, but they arent really sticky when it comes to tires for the track. They overheat and get greasy if you drive them hard, and they will slip at just slightly higher speeds. TL;DR: they are better than stock, but they arent a track sticky tire by any means so tail happy is still a thing.”
“Had this on my E90, as well. Alignment was good, wheel balance on road force machine was good. Turned out i had over 0.250" of runout on both rear wheels. Took me two sets of 255/35/18 PSS's and me watching them balance the tires to figure it out... bought new wheels, never went to a Tirediscounters since.”
Basierend auf 60 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Max Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 68 | — |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Profiltiefe | 7,9 mm (10/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Falken
Michelin
Sieger: Michelin Pilot Super Sport — besser bei Komfort, Trocken und Laufleistung. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport erreicht 93 vs 62 bei Komfort.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport erreicht 98 vs 80 bei Trocken.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport erreicht 90 vs 75 bei Laufleistung.
Michelin Pilot Super Sport erreicht 95 vs 81 bei Handling.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.