Tests 90 · 14 Tests Besitzer 86 · 82 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 6 im 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 (außengeräusch)
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 führt, 82–78 Knapper Vorsprung
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 90 · 14 Tests Besitzer 86 · 82 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 6 im 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 (außengeräusch)
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
Tests 92 · 32 Tests Besitzer 92 · 696 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 6 im 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (handling trocken)
“215/45 R17 — Primacy 4+ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 for a daily driver My current tyres have developed deep cracks so they need replacing. The annoying part is that half the tyres people recommend simply don't exist in 215/45 R17, which cuts the list down fast. The two that keep coming up are the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but they seem built for completely different drivers. Context: 2024 skoda Fabia 1.5 TSI. I'm not a sporty driver commuting and errands, occasionally push the pedal on an on-ramp, nothing crazy. Hot dry climate with heavy rain in winter and zero snow, so summer tyres only. What I actually want is longevity, comfort and solid wet grip. Quiet would be a bonus. Is the Asymmetric 6 just overkill for how I drive? And is there anything else in this size I should be looking at Read more”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 91 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 84 | 94 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 100% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 100% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 91 | 89 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 80 | 90 |
| Aquaplaning längs (% vom Besten) | 100% | 88% |
| Aquaplaning quer (% vom Besten) | 100% | 80% |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 100% | 94% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 88% | 96% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 95% | 100% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 100% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 81 | 68 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 80 | 82 |
| Innengeräusch (% vom Besten) | 80% | 80% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 80 | 73 |
| Außengeräusch (% vom Besten) | 100% | 80% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 64 | 74 |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 77 | 88 |
| Kategorie | Vredestein Ultrac | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 78 | 82 |
| Trocken | 84 | 92 |
| Nass | 86 | 90 |
| Komfort | 80 | 74 |
| Geräusch | 80 | 73 |
| Laufleistung | 64 | 74 |
| Handling | 77 | 88 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Ultrac
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Ultrac | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innengeräusch | Komfort | 80% #8/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 | 80% #8/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 95% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 95% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +0,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 98% #5/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −2,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #9/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | −1,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 96% #4/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 80% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +16,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 97% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 95% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +2,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Traktion Gras | Gras | 88% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 83% #4/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +5,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling Schotter | Kies | 99% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −0,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Traktion Kies | Kies | 87% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 95% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −7,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Außengeräusch | Geräusch | 100% #1/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | 80% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | +20,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 47% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 87% #6/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | −39,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 99% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −1,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 78% #3/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | 64% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | +13,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 35% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 69% #5/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | −34,5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 53% #19/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 68% #3/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −15,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 86% #2/8 · 2026 Auto Motor Und Sport Summer Tire Test R17 | 13% #8/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | +73,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Traktion Sand | Sand | 89% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 82% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +7,2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 98% #6/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 89% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | +9,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 92% #5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | 90% #3/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | +2,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Geräusch | Subjektiv | 80% #8/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | 80% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 80% #7/12 · 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 | 80% #2/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #1/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Nass | 100% #1/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | 88% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 | +11,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning quer | Nass | 100% #1/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | 80% #4/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 | +20,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 100% #2/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 94% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +5,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 88% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 96% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −7,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 95% #6/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | −4,6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 99% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | −0,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus online gefundenen Besitzerbewertungen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.
“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them. Read more”
“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”
Basierend auf 17 Community-Beiträgen
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with many drivers praising its balance of performance, wet/dry grip, and pricing compared to direct competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While a few users noted concerns regarding comfort, cold-weather performance in tests, or potential high-speed vibrations, the vast majority recommend them as top-tier daily driving and spirited performance tires.
“Goodyear EfficentGrip Performance 2 vs. Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I'm struggling to choose between the two as there is currently a deal on which means the difference in price is only £5 per tyre. I think that means the Asy6 is the no brainer, but my use case doesn't call for a UHP. I value comfort, road noise and resistance to dry cracking over anything else. I don't do many miles. I've already got the Asy6 on the rear axle (came with the wheels) and I'm looking to buy 2 new tyres for the front. I'll need rears at some point probably in the next year. I'd like my car to be more comfortable on broken roads, but I don't think the tyres are the main issue. The car is a Merc C180 estate family car. With 2 young kids, I don't exactly push the car hard. It mostly sits on the motorway or pootles around town. Am I overthinking it? Fronts: 225/45/17 Rears: 245/40/17”
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
Basierend auf 21 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Vredestein Ultrac | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · High Performance | Sommerreifen · Max Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Verfügbare Größen | — | 98 |
| Felgendurchmesser | — | 17″ – 23″ |
| Profiltiefe | — | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 260 - 300 AA A |
| Laufleistungsgarantie | — | 48.000 km |
| Seitenwand | — | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max. Druck | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Vredestein Ultrac
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Sieger: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — besser bei Handling, Laufleistung und Trocken. Wählen Sie den Vredestein Ultrac, wenn Ihnen Geräusch und Komfort am wichtigsten sind.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 88 vs 77 bei Handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 74 vs 64 bei Laufleistung.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 92 vs 84 bei Trocken.
Vredestein Ultrac erreicht 80 vs 73 bei Geräusch.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden online gefundenen Besitzerbewertungen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.