Tests 60 · 14 Tests Besitzer 64 · 411 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 3 von 21 im 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (aquaplaning quer)
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.
Ecsta HS52 liegt vorn, 76–63
Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Tests 60 · 14 Tests Besitzer 64 · 411 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 3 von 21 im 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (aquaplaning quer)
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
Tests 81 · 7 Tests Besitzer 71 · 2.328 Bewertungen
Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 2 von 55 im 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (bremsen trocken)
“Mini review of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 I was running some Hankook's on my GT before and the tire wall not stiff enough. Now I've mounted these Kumho Ecsta HS52's and I highly recommend them: The tire wall is nicely rigid and they grip great in the dry, took quite some intent to make them loose traction. Additionally, I've accidentally ran over a pretty big sharp looking rock at decent speed that aimed right in a tread groove (thinnest part) and the thing shrugged it off no problem. And all of this for a damn good price too! So if anyone's looking for good tires, now you know.”
Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 83 | 85 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 67 | 76 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 95% | 100% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 100% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 85 | 84 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 68 | 71 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 97% | 97% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 88% | 90% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 98% | 91% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 25% | 97% |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 65 | 60 |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 68 | 64 |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 10 | 78 |
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 56 | 67 |
| Quelle | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Online gefundene Bewertungen | 66 | 76 |
| Kategorie | Vredestein Ultrac | Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 63 | 76 |
| Trocken | 77 | 82 |
| Nass | 78 | 79 |
| Komfort | 67 | 65 |
| Geräusch | 68 | 65 |
| Laufleistung | 28 | 74 |
| Handling | 66 | 76 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Ultrac | Ecsta HS52 | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 95% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 82% #18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +12,8 | Gleicher Test |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 95% #6/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | −4,7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 99% #7/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | −0,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 84% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | −4,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 97% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 93% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3,4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 47% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 44% #30/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 96% #21/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −2,1 | Gleicher Test |
| Preis | Sonstige | 68% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 77% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −8,9 | Gleicher Test |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 38% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −60,3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 53% #19/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 77% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −23,8 | Gleicher Test |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 25% #7/8 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 | 40% #4/6 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Budget Summer Tire Test R16 | −15,0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 98% #6/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0,0 | Gleicher Test |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 97% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +0,1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 88% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 90% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −1,8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 98% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 91% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +6,6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 25% #5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | 97% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −71,9 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus online gefundenen Besitzerbewertungen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.
“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them. Read more”
“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”
Basierend auf 17 Community-Beiträgen
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.
“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”
“I had the kumho ecsta hs52's on my previous car. I was very satisfied with them. Good grip in the dry and wet and very responsive. Kumho in general makes really good tires”
“Bad i have hs52 on my audi a3 8l quattro 1.8t i have no grip with rain.. Like cant corner fast it just goes straight... Dry its fine but wet forget it. My oncle has the same experience with kuhmo on his bmw 118 diesel he got some rims and they had pretty good threats kumho on it. He said all it wanted was to drift and spin out. He said a couple of times it did a 180 he said never again i said same don't trust my car with these tyres. Im gonna get some new rim 17" and Goodyear asymmetric 6. To replace my 16" stock rims with kumho... I have had bad tyres but never this bad. Like 1 ere prix were even better in my Mercedes even doh they became ovals.”
Basierend auf 17 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Vredestein Ultrac | B · Kumho Ecsta HS52 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen | Sommerreifen |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Vredestein Ultrac
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Sieger: Kumho Ecsta HS52 — besser bei Laufleistung, Handling und Trocken. Wählen Sie den Vredestein Ultrac, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Kumho Ecsta HS52 erreicht 74 vs 28 bei Laufleistung.
Kumho Ecsta HS52 erreicht 76 vs 66 bei Handling.
Kumho Ecsta HS52 erreicht 82 vs 77 bei Trocken.
Vredestein Ultrac erreicht 68 vs 65 bei Geräusch.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen); jedes Ergebnis wird mit allen anderen Reifen im selben Test verglichen, neuere Tests zählen mehr. 40 % stammen aus online gefundenen Besitzerbewertungen, bereinigt um die unterschiedlich großzügige Wertung der einzelnen Seiten. Beide nutzen eine Skala: Der durchschnittliche getestete Reifen erhält 70, der beste 100. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, wird die fehlende Hälfte aus der anderen geschätzt und der Score bleibt näher am Durchschnitt; ohne Straßentest und mit weniger als fünf Besitzerbewertungen gibt es noch keinen Score.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.