Kumho Ecsta 712 im Test
The Kumho Ecsta 712 is widely regarded as a budget-oriented tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but suffers from significant safety concerns in wet weather. While some users appreciate its value and longevity, the consensus among enthusiasts and daily drivers alike is that its unpredictable handling and poor traction in rain make it a subpar choice compared to premium alternatives.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
52%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 10 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The Kumho Ecsta 712 is widely regarded as a budget-oriented tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but suffers from significant safety concerns in wet weather. While some users appreciate its value and longevity, the consensus among enthusiasts and daily drivers alike is that its unpredictable handling and poor traction in rain make it a subpar choice compared to premium alternatives.
Vorteile
- Highly competitive price point
- Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
- Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving
- Low road noise reported by some users
Nachteile
- Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
- High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
- Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
- Reports of premature structural failure, such as tires going 'out of round'
Gut zu wissen
- High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., R33 Skyline, 300+ bhp coupes) frequently report dangerous handling characteristics in wet conditions.
- Users noted a measurable drop in fuel economy immediately following installation.
- The tire compound appears to harden significantly as it wears, leading to a drastic reduction in performance over time.