Bridgestone B 390 im Test
The Bridgestone B 390 is generally regarded as a competent, albeit aging, all-rounder that often serves as an original equipment choice for various passenger vehicles. While users appreciate its dry-weather performance and longevity in specific low-usage scenarios, the tire is frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and a tendency to wander at highway speeds.
Zwei Bewertungssysteme im Vergleich
Besitzer-Scores stammen aus Bewertungen bei Händlern und auf Bewertungsportalen, Straßentest-Scores aus Messungen. Wo sie abweichen, geht es meist um eine Disziplin, die Besitzer selten ans Limit bringen.
Nach Besitzerbewertungen
67%Was Besitzern gefällt und was nicht
Themen aus 10 Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen.
The Bridgestone B 390 is generally regarded as a competent, albeit aging, all-rounder that often serves as an original equipment choice for various passenger vehicles. While users appreciate its dry-weather performance and longevity in specific low-usage scenarios, the tire is frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and a tendency to wander at highway speeds.
Vorteile
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Solid performance as an original equipment factory fitment
- Good durability when used in low-mileage or climate-controlled conditions
- Satisfactory all-around performance for daily commuting
Nachteile
- Short tread life reported by many users
- Noticeable road noise, particularly from the rear axle
- Tendency for the vehicle to wander or track poorly at highway speeds
- Stiff ride quality on uneven or damaged road surfaces
Gut zu wissen
- Users of commercial or utility-focused vehicles like the Ford Transit Connect reported disappointing tread longevity.
- Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the Skoda Octavia noted a consistent issue with vehicle wandering at highway speeds.
- The tire demonstrates high durability in tropical, low-mileage environments, as evidenced by long-term performance on a Toyota Innova.