Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 78 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 97 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 59 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 91 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | – | 60 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 75 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 49 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 76 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 95 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 73 | – |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 88 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 65 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | – |
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 66 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | – |
| Kategorie | Falken Azenis FK510 | Nexen N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 78 | 78 |
| Trocken | 80 | 83 |
| Nass | 85 | 71 |
| Schnee | – | 71 |
| Komfort | 62 | 82 |
| Geräusch | 84 | 97 |
| Laufleistung | 75 | 75 |
| Handling | 81 | 66 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
The Nexen N Priz 4S presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its affordability and competent performance in dry and light snowy conditions. However, significant inconsistencies in wet-weather traction and tread longevity lead to widely varying reports, ranging from excellent value to safety concerns.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
| Merkmal | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Nexen N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Ganzjahresreifen · Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 68 | — |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Profiltiefe | 7,9 mm (10/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | — |
Falken
Nexen
Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Falken Azenis FK510 und Nexen N Priz 4S liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Falken Azenis FK510 ist stärker bei Handling und Nass. Nexen N Priz 4S ist stärker bei Komfort, Geräusch und Trocken.
Nexen N Priz 4S erreicht 82 vs 62 bei Komfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 81 vs 66 bei Handling.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 85 vs 71 bei Nass.
Nexen N Priz 4S erreicht 97 vs 84 bei Geräusch.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.
