Direktvergleich Aktualisiert

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 — im Vergleich

Relative Score (0–100): 60 % Profi-Tests, 40 % Besitzerbewertungen.

EfficientGrip Performance 2 führt, 81–80 Knapper Vorsprung

Ihre Größe angeben für genaue Treffer
/R

Beide Amazon-Links suchen dann genau diese Größe.

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Reifen AGoodyear

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Tests 83 · 21 Tests Besitzer 86 · 115 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 1 von 10 im 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test (rollwiderstand)

“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”

Reifen BKumho

Ecsta HS52

Sommerreifen · Premium Touring

Tests 84 · 6 Tests Besitzer 81 · 23 Bewertungen

Bestes Testergebnis: Platz 3 von 20 im 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (handling trocken)

“Mini review of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 I was running some Hankook's on my GT before and the tire wall not stiff enough. Now I've mounted these Kumho Ecsta HS52's and I highly recommend them: The tire wall is nicely rigid and they grip great in the dry, took quite some intent to make them loose traction. Additionally, I've accidentally ran over a pretty big sharp looking rock at decent speed that aimed right in a tread groove (thinnest part) and the thing shrugged it off no problem. And all of this for a damn good price too! So if anyone's looking for good tires, now you know.”

Kategorie für Kategorie

Relative Score je Kategorie, 0–100. „Warum dieser Wert“ zeigt die Tests und Besitzerwertungen dahinter.

  1. 86

    Trocken

    Ecsta HS52 +5
    91
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)8391
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer9090
    Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten)81%95%
    Handling trocken (% vom Besten)99%100%
  2. 80

    Nass

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +1
    79
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)7678
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer8680
    Bremsen nass (% vom Besten)93%97%
    Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten)86%81%
    Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten)86%92%
    Handling nass (% vom Besten)98%97%
  3. 84

    Komfort

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +14
    70
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)83–
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer8570
  4. 53

    Geräusch

    Ecsta HS52 +33
    86
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score)5386
  5. 91

    Laufleistung

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +16
    75
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer9175
  6. 84

    Handling

    EfficientGrip Performance 2 +1
    83
    Warum dieser Score
    QuelleEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52
    Tyre Reviews Besitzer8483
    DriverReviews Besitzer8478
Scores im Überblick
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieGoodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2Kumho Ecsta HS52
Relativer Score 81 80
Trocken 86 91
Nass 80 79
Komfort 84 70
Geräusch 53 86
Laufleistung 91 75
Handling 84 83

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Ecsta HS52

Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores

Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.

DisziplinKategorieEfficientGrip Performance 2Ecsta HS52ΔBeide?
Aquaplaning quer Kurve 80% #9/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 82% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test −1,4 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen trocken Trocken 81% #5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 95% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −13,5 Verschiedene Tests
Handling trocken Trocken 99% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 100% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test −0,8 Verschiedene Tests
Rollwiderstand Effizienz 100% #1/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test +11,6 Verschiedene Tests
Kraftstoffverbrauch Kraftstoff 95% #2/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test 100% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −4,7 Verschiedene Tests
Abrieb Sonstige 51% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 63% #30/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −12,4 Verschiedene Tests
Geräusch Sonstige 98% #5/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test 98% #7/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test +0,2 Verschiedene Tests
Preis Sonstige 78% #8/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 68% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +10,4 Verschiedene Tests
Preis-Leistung Sonstige 42% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 50% #5/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test −8,3 Gleicher Test
Verschleiß Sonstige 99% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 77% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +22,5 Verschiedene Tests
Gesamtplatzierung Gesamt 33% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test 33% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 0,0 Verschiedene Tests
Aquaplaning längs Geradeaus 95% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 94% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +1,4 Gleicher Test
Gesamtkosten Gesamt 0% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test 0% #7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0,0 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen nass Nass 93% #13/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −4,1 Verschiedene Tests
Bremsen nass – Beton Nass 86% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 81% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +4,9 Gleicher Test
Kreisbahn nass Nass 86% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 92% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −6,7 Gleicher Test
Handling nass Nass 98% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test 97% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +1,0 Verschiedene Tests

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A EfficientGrip Performance 2

Vorteile

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
  • Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance

Nachteile

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and body roll
  • Reported increase in road noise as the tire wears
  • Not suitable for aggressive or sporty driving styles
Alle Besitzer-Themen im EfficientGrip Performance 2-Test

Reifen B Ecsta HS52

Vorteile

  • Excellent dry and wet braking performance
  • Strong cornering grip and handling confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition

Nachteile

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature degradation
  • Noise levels can be intrusive at higher speeds
  • Sensitivity to tire pressure, affecting ride comfort
Alle Besitzer-Themen im Ecsta HS52-Test

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Positiv

Community feedback for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, highlighting exceptional durability, great wet performance, and high comfort levels. Some users note drawbacks such as softer sidewalls affecting sharp handling during spirited driving, while others debate comparisons with rival brands like Michelin and Continental.

r/TyreReviews ·3 Upvotes ·2026-06-16

“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”

r/tires ·1 Upvote ·2024-02-26

“close call, if you looking for rolling resistance Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the right one but otherwise is PC6. You can see how the newer PC7 fair against the Goodyear below”

r/tires ·1 Upvote ·2024-11-10

“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”

Top-Themen
#High treadwear and longevity#Wet weather performance#Ride comfort and low noise#Soft sidewalls and cornering#Fuel efficiency and rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy

Basierend auf 9 Community-Beiträgen

Reifen B

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Gemischt

Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is generally positive regarding its rigid sidewalls, dry grip, responsiveness, and budget-friendly pricing, though some users report mixed experiences with wet weather performance, aquaplaning, or durability over time.

r/tires ·3 Upvotes ·2025-09-23

“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”

r/TyreReviews ·2 Upvotes ·2026-02-07

“I had the kumho ecsta hs52's on my previous car. I was very satisfied with them. Good grip in the dry and wet and very responsive. Kumho in general makes really good tires”

r/TyreReviews ·1 Upvote ·2026-01-22

“Bad i have hs52 on my audi a3 8l quattro 1.8t i have no grip with rain.. Like cant corner fast it just goes straight... Dry its fine but wet forget it. My oncle has the same experience with kuhmo on his bmw 118 diesel he got some rims and they had pretty good threats kumho on it. He said all it wanted was to drift and spin out. He said a couple of times it did a 180 he said never again i said same don't trust my car with these tyres. Im gonna get some new rim 17" and Goodyear asymmetric 6. To replace my 16" stock rims with kumho... I have had bad tyres but never this bad. Like 1 ere prix were even better in my Mercedes even doh they became ovals.”

Top-Themen
#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Dry and wet grip performance#Value and price comparison#Fuel consumption and rolling resistance#Magazine test inconsistencies

Basierend auf 16 Community-Beiträgen

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 B · Kumho Ecsta HS52
KategorieSommerreifen · Premium TouringSommerreifen · Premium Touring
FahrzeugtypPassenger Car / Crossover—
Profiltiefe6,4 mm (8/32″)—
UTQG300 A - AA A—
SeitenwandBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering—
Max. Druck3,4 bar (50 psi)—

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 und Kumho Ecsta HS52 liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 ist stärker bei Laufleistung und Komfort. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ist stärker bei Geräusch und Trocken.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen einen leiseren Innenraum

Kumho Ecsta HS52 erreicht 86 vs 53 bei Geräusch.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 91 vs 75 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen A wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 84 vs 70 bei Komfort.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen maximalen Grip auf trockener Straße

Kumho Ecsta HS52 erreicht 91 vs 86 bei Trocken.

Reifen A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Reifen B · Kumho Ecsta HS52

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über diese Links.

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.

81

Knapper Vorsprung

EfficientGrip Performance 2

Amazon