Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Nexen N Fera Primus — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 90 | 87 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 94% | 95% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 98% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 86 | 90 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 93% | 96% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 86% | 65% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 92% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 97% | 98% |
Schnee
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 81 | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 80 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 70 | 81 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 91 | 84 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 84 | 77 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 84 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 84 | 76 |
| Trocken | 87 | 76 |
| Nass | 82 | 84 |
| Schnee | – | 76 |
| Komfort | 83 | 35 |
| Geräusch | 70 | 85 |
| Laufleistung | 91 | 85 |
| Handling | 84 | 77 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 94% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 89% #10/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.1 | Gleicher Test |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 94% #14/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -0.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #2/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | 98% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 64% #18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +36.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 97% #4/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | -1.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 49% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 70% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -21.3 | Gleicher Test |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 99% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 98% #8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +0.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 84% #8/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | 70% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +14.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 45% #8/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 75% #19/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -30.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 43% #19/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +57 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 100% #1/10 · 2020 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 10% #10/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | +90 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 96% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 97% #4/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -1.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 90% #3/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 40% #9/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | +50 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 92% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 60% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | +31.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Geräusch | Subjektiv | 100% #1/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | 60% #5/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | +40 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #1/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 93% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 96% #5/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 86% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 65% #12/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +20.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 92% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +7.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 97% #3/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -1 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is widely regarded as a premier touring tire, consistently praised for its exceptional longevity, comfort, and low noise levels. While most users report a transformative improvement in ride quality and fuel efficiency compared to OEM tires, a minority of drivers note a 'vague' steering feel due to soft sidewalls and occasional reports of increased noise as the tire ages.
Vorteile
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Significant improvement over factory-fitted eco-tires
Nachteile
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Reported increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Not suitable for aggressive or sporty driving styles
- Occasional reports of structural issues or vibration at higher mileages
Beobachtungen
- Users with heavy EVs and diesel estates report impressive mileage, often exceeding 40,000 miles.
- Drivers of vehicles with stiff 'sports' suspension noted that the tire's soft sidewall helps significantly with comfort, though it reduces steering precision.
- Some users on 16-inch and 17-inch wheels noted that the tire's comfort-oriented design makes the vehicle feel less 'sharp' compared to UHP alternatives.
The Nexen N Fera Primus is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its comfort, quiet ride, and affordability, it is strictly a summer-oriented tire that performs poorly in freezing or wintry conditions.
Vorteile
- Excellent value for the price point
- Strong wet and dry surface traction
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Predictable handling and stability in spirited driving
Nachteile
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow or freezing temperatures
- Potential for rapid tread wear
- Inconsistent reports regarding road noise levels
- Long-term durability concerns, such as sidewall cracking after several years
Beobachtungen
- Users with lightweight vehicles noted that XL (Extra Load) rated tires can feel overly stiff, increasing sensitivity to road imperfections.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Focus RS) reported that the tire provides competitive grip levels compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Super Sport.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Community feedback for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, highlighting exceptional durability, great wet performance, and high comfort levels. Some users note drawbacks such as softer sidewalls affecting sharp handling during spirited driving, while others debate comparisons with rival brands like Michelin and Continental.
“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
“close call, if you looking for rolling resistance Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the right one but otherwise is PC6. You can see how the newer PC7 fair against the Goodyear below”
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
Basierend auf 9 Community-Beiträgen
Nexen N Fera Primus
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | B · Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Profiltiefe | 6,4 mm (8/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A - AA A | — |
| Seitenwand | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Goodyear
Nexen
Sieger: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — besser bei Komfort, Trocken und Handling. Wählen Sie den Nexen N Fera Primus, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 83 vs 35 bei Komfort.
Nexen N Fera Primus erreicht 85 vs 70 bei Geräusch.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 87 vs 76 bei Trocken.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 erreicht 84 vs 77 bei Handling.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.