Zum Inhalt springen
Direktvergleich Aktualisiert September 2026

Continental CrossContact UHP vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — im Vergleich (September 2026)

Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.

Continental CrossContact UHP tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
–/100
Noch keine Testdaten
Besitzer (40 %)
71/100
34 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
86
Nass
79
Schnee
–
Komfort
72
Geräusch
–
Laufleistung
53
Handling
74

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

VS
Reifen B Michelin

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Ganzjahresreifen · Premium Touring

Michelin CrossClimate 2 tread pattern
Objektiv (60 %)
95/100
37 professionelle Tests
Besitzer (40 %)
81/100
143 Besitzerbewertungen
Trocken
90
Nass
83
Schnee
82
Komfort
77
Geräusch
72
Laufleistung
82
Handling
74

Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.

FazitSieger: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — besser bei Laufleistung, Komfort und Trocken. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Ganz lesen

TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.

Kategorien im Detail

7 Kategorien im Vergleich

Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.

Trocken

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 4 vorn
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
86
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
90
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 92
Tire Rack Besitzer 87 94
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 86 86
SimpleTire Besitzer 97 –
America's Tire Besitzer – 98

Nass

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 4 vorn
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
79
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
83
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 84
Tire Rack Besitzer 82 94
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 79 82
SimpleTire Besitzer 90 –
America's Tire Besitzer – 97

Schnee

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
–
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 80
Tire Rack Besitzer – 88
Tyre Reviews Besitzer – 85
SimpleTire Besitzer 75 –

Komfort

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 5 vorn
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
72
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
77
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 73
Tire Rack Besitzer 82 89
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 72 84
SimpleTire Besitzer 97 –
America's Tire Besitzer – 96

Geräusch

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
–
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
72
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) – 72
SimpleTire Besitzer 94 –
America's Tire Besitzer – 92

Laufleistung

Gewichtung: Wichtig
Score (0–100) CrossClimate 2 liegt 29 vorn
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
53
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
82
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Tire Rack Besitzer 66 91
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 53 82
SimpleTire Besitzer 92 –
America's Tire Besitzer – 95

Handling

Gewichtung: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact UHP
74
B — Michelin CrossClimate 2
74
Warum dieser Score
QuelleCrossContact UHPCrossClimate 2
Tyre Reviews Besitzer 74 74
America's Tire Besitzer – 97
DriverReviews Besitzer – 84

Scores im Überblick

Continental CrossContact UHP vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: Scores nach Kategorie (0–100)
KategorieContinental CrossContact UHPMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relativer Score 71 82
Trocken 86 90
Nass 79 83
Schnee – 82
Komfort 72 77
Geräusch – 72
Laufleistung 53 82
Handling 74 74

Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.

Personalisieren

Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind

Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.

Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Wichtig
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neutral
KeinWenigerNeutralMehrMax
Neu berechnet
Gesamtscore

Reifen A

Reifen B

In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.

Von Besitzern

Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen

Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.

Reifen A Continental CrossContact UHP

The Continental Cross Contact UHP is a polarizing tire that delivers strong dry and wet road performance but suffers from significant inconsistency regarding tread longevity. While many users praise its handling, stability, and confidence-inspiring grip, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature and uneven wear, particularly on heavier SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.

Vorteile

  • Strong dry and wet road grip
  • Predictable handling and cornering stability
  • Good performance in light snow and varied weather conditions
  • Quiet operation on many vehicle platforms

Nachteile

  • Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • High road noise reported by a significant subset of users
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality
  • Poor off-road capability, particularly on wet grass or mud

Beobachtungen

  • Heavy SUVs and 4x4s frequently exhibit rapid front-axle tire wear, often requiring rotation as early as 8,000-10,000 miles to maintain even tread depth.
  • Users with high-center-of-gravity vehicles report that aggressive cornering significantly accelerates rear tire scrubbing.
  • Performance varies notably by vehicle weight; lighter or more balanced setups report significantly higher mileage than heavy luxury SUVs.
Reifen B Michelin CrossClimate 2

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 is widely regarded as a benchmark all-weather tire, offering exceptional snow and ice traction that rivals dedicated winter tires while maintaining respectable dry and wet performance. While most users praise its year-round versatility and comfort, a subset of owners reports concerns regarding wet-weather confidence, increased road noise as the tire wears, and a noticeable impact on fuel efficiency.

Vorteile

  • Outstanding snow and ice traction for an all-season tire
  • Excellent dry road handling and braking performance
  • High levels of ride comfort and noise refinement when new
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • Long-term durability and tread life for many users

Nachteile

  • Noticeable drop in fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or low-rolling-resistance tires
  • Increased road noise and ride stiffness as the tread wears down
  • Mixed feedback on wet-weather grip, with some users reporting understeer or lack of confidence
  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Performance degradation in extreme summer heat

Beobachtungen

  • EV and hybrid owners frequently report a 5-7% reduction in range or fuel efficiency due to higher rolling resistance.
  • Users with high-performance or high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Mustang) often find the tire's sidewall and compound too soft for spirited driving, leading to unpredictable handling.
  • Drivers of heavier SUVs and crossovers generally report higher satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle inclement weather compared to lighter passenger cars.
Community-Meinungen

Was echte Besitzer sagen

Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores

Reifen A

Continental CrossContact UHP

Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.

Reifen B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Gemischt

Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is largely positive regarding its exceptional snow, ice, and wet weather traction, with many users praising its quiet ride and aggressive look. However, some dissenters point out potential drawbacks such as increased road noise as the tread ages, a minor hit to fuel economy or EV range, and questioned value for users who live in mild climates without winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 Upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

r/crv ·53 Upvotes ·2023-06-23

“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”

r/MachE ·37 Upvotes ·2026-07-23

“PSA: Michelin CrossClimate 2 - They make noise. Recently purchased Michelin Cross Climate 2s for my MachE from Costco. I received a fairly decent price (1,000 for 4) vs local competitors (1,400 for 4). I've seen a lot of people say how great they are, and I thought I'd give them a shot. They look nice. They definitely give it a more 'off-road' look. They also come with a 65,000 mile warranty which they said applied to EVs as well, which is nice as well. They feel great driving. I appreciate their excellent traction and feel secure on turns. I haven't been able to test them on snow yet, but they perform well on wet roads. That being said. They definitely make noise. They make a little at lower, city speeds (~35 mph). They also make a really weird noise at highway speeds (~70 mph+). Neither is so loud or annoying that a little radio can't cover up the sound. Overall, I am very pleased with the tire and the price I received. However, be warned, they do make noise. EDIT: I originally posted this is the Ford Mustang MachE forum and forgot to say that I put them on my MachE. The MachE, being an EV, may be why the noise is more noticeable for me versus others. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·35 Upvotes ·2026-01-18

“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”

Top-Themen
#Snow and ice performance#Wet weather traction#Road noise and ride comfort#Fuel economy and EV range impact#Tread wear and longevity#Price and value comparison

Basierend auf 393 Community-Beiträgen

Technische Daten

Daten im Vergleich

Merkmal A · Continental CrossContact UHP B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Kategorie—Ganzjahresreifen · Premium Touring
Fahrzeugtyp—Passenger Car / Crossover
Verfügbare Größen91
Felgendurchmesser18″ – 21″19″
Profiltiefe9 - 10/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A640 B A
Laufleistungsgarantie—97.000 km
SeitenwandBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max. Druck50 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Fazit

Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?

Continental

Michelin

Sieger: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — besser bei Laufleistung, Komfort und Trocken. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen die höchste Laufleistung

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 82 vs 53 bei Laufleistung.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen den höchsten Fahrkomfort

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 77 vs 72 bei Komfort.

Reifen B wählen Sie wollen maximalen Grip auf trockener Straße

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 90 vs 86 bei Trocken.

Reifen B wählen Ihnen ist Sicherheit bei Nässe am wichtigsten

Michelin CrossClimate 2 erreicht 83 vs 79 bei Nass.

Reifen A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Reifen B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?

Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.

Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.