Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 83 | 84 |
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | – |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 75 |
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 80 | 76 |
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 37 | – |
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 77 |
| Quelle | Energy Saver | Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 74 |
| Kategorie | Michelin Energy Saver | Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 79 | 77 |
| Trocken | 81 | 84 |
| Nass | 76 | 75 |
| Schnee | 52 | – |
| Komfort | 80 | 76 |
| Geräusch | 37 | – |
| Laufleistung | 85 | 77 |
| Handling | 71 | 74 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
The Michelin Primacy HP is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers impressive fuel efficiency. While many users praise its longevity and stability on motorways, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding wet-weather performance, particularly as the tread wears down, and a high price point that some feel is not justified by its aging characteristics.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy HP is divided. While some enthusiasts view them as lacking grip and inferior compared to Michelin's performance-oriented Pilot Sport line, others appreciate them as stock tires for daily driving or playful street handling due to their predictable breakaway and low rolling resistance.
“Pilot Super Sports VS Stock Primacy HP? One of my Primacy HP tires got a screw and it's not reparable. I'm considering taking this opportunity to fit my FRS with 4 Pilot Super Sports, but I've heard the Primacy HP tires are actually pretty decent tires. I do not track my car, I just daily drive it. Will I notice a significant improvement by upgrading to the super sports? Or will they be wasted on me? My research has turned up that the Super Sports will change my life. I will inherit millions of dollars, and cats around the world will love me. This makes me think they miiiight be a little overrated. In the same light, the Primacy HP's seem to be severely underrated, and the myth about them being crappy Prius tires seems to be the anchor in the bias. Can anyone who actually knows their sh-tuff help me out here? TL;DR: I don't track my car. Will stock Primacy HP's be as good as Pilot Super Sports for my intents and purposes?”
“You will notice the difference, but if you don't track, autocross, or canyon carve, I wouldn't bother. You don't have to stick with Primacy but it's not worth the PSS. The only reason I would go PSS in that instance, is if the price is similar to Primacy HP (it might actually be similar). If you drive in snow at all I would not go with PSS. Do not go with anything more aggressive than PSS for day to day street driving. There are people who daily drive more aggressive RS3s, RE-71s, ZII Star Specs, etc. but they track/autocross, know the limits, and take it easy around standing water.”
“I agree with the other posters on the Michelin and Continental tires being a huge performance upgrade, but keep in mind that the Primacy HPs are low rolling resistance fuel economy oriented and are also used on some Prius models. You will have a 1 to 2 mpg reduction switching to summer tires.”
“PSA: The Stock Michelin Primacy HP tires are SUMMER tires! I figured, given that winter has finally arrived in much of the US, I'd make a quick reminder that this car ships in the US with summer only tires. I've noticed that this fact is rarely mentioned in threads about snowy weather or winter tires, and I myself didn't realize this until just before I bought mine. A quick explanation for the non-car guys in the sub. Most cars in the US sell new with all-season tires mounted. These are tires that maintain a balance to allow them to work OK on hot dry pavement, in the rain, and in winter weather. Not great, but OK. They're a jack of all trades, master of none In contrast, these cars (at least in the US market) shipped with summer-only tires. This means that they are NOT OK for use in winter weather--even just cold dry pavement. Summer tires are made of a compound that is too hard in cold weather, therefore not sticky even on clean pavement. In addition, they often lack the open spaces in the tread that are necessary for good snow traction.”
Basierend auf 10 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Michelin Energy Saver | B · Michelin Primacy HP |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Michelin
Michelin
Sieger: Michelin Energy Saver — besser bei Laufleistung und Komfort. Wählen Sie den Michelin Primacy HP, wenn Ihnen Trocken und Handling am wichtigsten sind.
Michelin Energy Saver erreicht 85 vs 77 bei Laufleistung.
Michelin Energy Saver erreicht 80 vs 76 bei Komfort.
Michelin Primacy HP erreicht 84 vs 81 bei Trocken.
Michelin Primacy HP erreicht 74 vs 71 bei Handling.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.
