Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Falken FK510 SUV — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 97 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 83 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 97 | – |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 98% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 99% | 100% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 84 | 93 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 84 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 91 | – |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 98% | 100% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 90% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 100% |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 49 | 26 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 73 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 95 | – |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 73 | 78 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 88 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 66 |
| SimpleTire Besitzer | 80 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Azenis FK510 | FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 82 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Falken Azenis FK510 | Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 78 | 78 |
| Trocken | 80 | 93 |
| Nass | 85 | 90 |
| Komfort | 62 | 48 |
| Geräusch | 84 | 87 |
| Laufleistung | 75 | 67 |
| Handling | 81 | 82 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 91% #4/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | +8.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 99% #3/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +0.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 99% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | -0.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 84% #8/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +7.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 96% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | 97% #3/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | -0.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 63% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 85% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -21.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 33% #3/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 33% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 96% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +0.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 78% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 67% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +11.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | -20 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 80% #11/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 67% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +13.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 98% #4/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -1.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | 90% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | +8.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 94% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -5.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable handling characteristics
Nachteile
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
- Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
- Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down
Beobachtungen
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
- Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
The Falken FK510 SUV is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that delivers excellent dry handling, comfort, and noise suppression. While users consistently praise its competitive pricing and road manners, the consensus is divided regarding tread longevity, with several reports of premature wear on performance-oriented SUVs.
Vorteile
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Superior dry handling and traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in spirited driving scenarios
Nachteile
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
- Soft sidewalls may lead to edge wear if pressures are not managed
Beobachtungen
- Performance-oriented SUVs like the Porsche Cayenne GTS and Mercedes C43 show significantly accelerated tread wear.
- Users report that the tire's soft sidewall construction enhances ride comfort but requires careful attention to alignment and tire pressure to prevent uneven edge wear.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Basierend auf 25 Community-Beiträgen
Falken FK510 SUV
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV und 4x4 |
| Verfügbare Größen | 68 | — |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Profiltiefe | 7,9 mm (10/32″) | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
| Max. Druck | 3,4 bar (50 psi) | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Falken
Falken
Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Falken Azenis FK510 und Falken FK510 SUV liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Falken Azenis FK510 ist stärker bei Komfort und Laufleistung. Falken FK510 SUV ist stärker bei Trocken, Nass und Geräusch.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 62 vs 48 bei Komfort.
Falken FK510 SUV erreicht 93 vs 80 bei Trocken.
Falken Azenis FK510 erreicht 75 vs 67 bei Laufleistung.
Falken FK510 SUV erreicht 90 vs 85 bei Nass.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.