Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 90 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 96% | 99% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 98% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 80 | 91 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 95% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 65% | 64% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 100% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 92% | 99% |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 73 | 84 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 92 | 82 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 81 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 79 | 83 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 82 | 88 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 79 | 89 |
| Trocken | 81 | 91 |
| Nass | 83 | 90 |
| Komfort | 74 | 84 |
| Geräusch | 92 | 86 |
| Laufleistung | 71 | 90 |
| Handling | 79 | 95 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #1/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/7 · Michelin Range Test - CrossClimate 3, 3 Sport, Primacy 5, Pilot Sport 5 and Cup 2 | +0.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 96% #9/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | -2.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #4/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -0.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 83% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 83% #7/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | -0.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 98% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +1.7 | Gleicher Test |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 88% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 68% #1/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | +20 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 100% #9/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | +0.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 69% #6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #6/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | -30.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 47% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 89% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | -41.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 50% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 88% #2/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | -38 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 10% #10/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 20% #5/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | -10 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 98% #3/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | -1.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 94% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #2/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 70% #7/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | -26 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 60% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 60% #7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #7/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 0% #6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 94% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 95% #7/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -1.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 65% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 64% #3/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +1.3 | Gleicher Test |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 100% #5/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | -1.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 92% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #3/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | -6.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
Vorteile
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Predictable handling and cornering feedback
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
Nachteile
- Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
- Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style
Beobachtungen
- Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
- Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance tire that excels in balancing daily comfort with impressive wet and dry grip. While many users praise its longevity and refinement compared to its predecessor, some enthusiasts note a slight reduction in steering sharpness and feedback, positioning it more as a sophisticated grand-touring tire than a dedicated track-focused performance tire.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of comfort and reduced road noise compared to many competitors
- Strong tread life and durability for an ultra-high-performance tire
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling in daily driving conditions
Nachteile
- Softer sidewall construction leads to less steering precision and feedback
- Tendency toward understeer when pushed to the absolute limit
- Higher price point compared to some direct competitors
- Reports of uneven wear or 'out-of-round' issues near the end of the tire's life
Beobachtungen
- EV owners report a noticeable decrease in range due to higher rolling resistance compared to OEM efficiency-focused tires.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise.
- Drivers of high-horsepower vehicles note that while grip is excellent for street use, the tire can overheat and lose performance during aggressive track sessions.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Basierend auf 19 Community-Beiträgen
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to older generations and direct rivals. While some enthusiast drivers find the sidewalls a bit soft or note less extreme dry grip and steering feel compared to hardcore track tires like the PS4S or SportContact 7, it is widely praised as the ultimate daily-driver performance tire.
“My 8-month experience with Michelin Pilot Sport 5 – honest thoughts after highway + city use Switched to Michelin Pilot Sport 5s about 8 months ago on my Hyundai Creta]and figured I'd share a proper update since I couldn't find many India-based long-term reviews when I was researching. Background: I drive a mix of Delhi–Gurugram highway stretches and stop-go city traffic. Previous tyres were Ceat tyres. Wet grip: This is where they genuinely shine. Monsoon season in NCR was the real test — braking distances felt noticeably shorter than my previous set, and I never had that nervous moment on waterlogged roads near Dhaula Kuan. Dry handling: Confident and predictable. Not much to complain about here. Cornering feel is crisp, especially at highway speeds. Ride comfort: Slightly firmer than my old tyres, which I expected given the performance focus. Not harsh — just different. Long highway runs are still comfortable. Noise: Quieter than I expected for a performance tyre. Road noise on concrete sections of NH-48 is very manageable. Fuel efficiency: Marginal difference — maybe 0.3–0.5 kmpl lower, hard to say definitively. Wear so far: Looking good at 8 months / ~7,000 km. No uneven wear patterns. Would I buy again? Probably yes, especially if wet weather safety matters to you. Price premium over budget options is real, but the wet grip gives peace of mind. Happy to answer any questions. Anyone else running Michelins in Indian conditions? Read more”
“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”
“In my experience they are quite long wearing tires and well worth the cost. I used to get around 40k out of most tyres. My first set of ps4’s lasted 55k and now the ps5’s are trending to beat it. I'm a pretty spirited driver around the roundabouts of Canberra too, though I only have a hatch so experiences may vary. As to performance I've driven them on my i30 n-line and other people’s i30N, BRZ, tesla 3, and stinger and the tyres have more grip than I have guts to push them on public roads. In both wet and dry they are very confidence inspiring and a hell of a lot of fun.”
“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
Basierend auf 130 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Max Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Kumho
Michelin
Sieger: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — besser bei Laufleistung, Handling und Trocken. Wählen Sie den Kumho Ecsta PS71, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 90 vs 71 bei Laufleistung.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 95 vs 79 bei Handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 91 vs 81 bei Trocken.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 erreicht 84 vs 74 bei Komfort.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.