Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Michelin Primacy 4 vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
6 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 60 |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 30 |
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 83 | 30 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 75 | – |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 82 | – |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Primacy 4 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 10 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Michelin Primacy 4 | Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 81 | 32 |
| Trocken | 87 | 60 |
| Nass | 83 | 30 |
| Komfort | 77 | 30 |
| Geräusch | 75 | – |
| Laufleistung | 82 | – |
| Handling | 77 | 10 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy 4 is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and consistent wet-weather performance. While it is highly praised for its longevity and safety, some enthusiasts find its handling 'floaty' or lacking in road feedback compared to sport-oriented tires, leading to a polarized experience depending on driving style.
Vorteile
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Consistent performance even as the tire wears
- Strong wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
Nachteile
- Vague steering feel and lack of road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can feel 'mushy' or 'floaty' during spirited driving
- High price point compared to competitors
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages
Beobachtungen
- Users with heavier vehicles or EVs often report a 'floaty' sensation, which some mitigate by increasing tire pressure.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks often find the tire's touring-focused design disappointing compared to UHP alternatives.
- The tire is frequently noted for transforming the ride quality of vehicles previously fitted with harsh run-flat tires.
The Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP receives highly critical feedback, with users reporting significant deficiencies in handling, traction, and structural integrity. The consensus suggests that the tire fails to meet the performance expectations of an Ultra High Performance category, leading to a poor driving experience and safety concerns.
Nachteile
- Severe lack of traction and grip
- Excessive road noise
- Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
- Unpredictable handling and excessive understeer
Beobachtungen
- Users reported significant instability and swaying during direction changes when the tires were mounted on the rear axle.
- The tire's soft construction was noted to cause handling issues even at moderate speeds, requiring electronic stability control intervention.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Michelin Primacy 4
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy 4 is largely positive, praising its exceptional wet braking capabilities, impressive longevity, low cabin noise, and smooth ride quality. While some users note limitations in heavy snow or rougher tarmac surfaces, it is widely recommended as a top-tier touring tire for daily driving compared to sportier alternatives like the Pilot Sport series.
“Review: Michelin Primacy 4 ST I own a 2023 N8 DCT and recently changed all four tyres from the stock CEATs after one of the tyres’ sidewall was punctured on hitting a rather deep pothole at high speed. Cost: INR 9,750 per tyre Existing tyre buyback: INR 1,000 per tyre (~15k kms) Review: I’ve been using the new tyres for a few weeks now and I’m happy with the upgrade. The difference is noticeable, but only if you pay attention. I’d say a non-savvy person won’t notice anything different unless you ask them to pay attention. At low speeds, the road noise is reduced and the vehicle is noticeably silent (almost dead silent if the roads are smooth and the engine is at low revs) and smoother. At high speeds, the noise level difference is not very noticeable due to the engine and wind noise, but the smoothness and grip is noticeably better. That said, I wouldn’t say the stock tyres are bad (in terms of both - noise and grip) as a lot of reviewers like to point out; definitely not a night and day difference for me. Lastly, I believe the fuel efficiency has improved due to the lower rolling resistance, but I don’t have enough data to claim this confidently. My verdict is to only upgrade if your current tyres are worn out. Personally, I don’t think spending close to 40k is worth it for the budget conscious. But if you have the money to spare, you will definitely be happy with the upgrade. Read more”
“Am avut primacy 4 pe o electrica. Destul de dezamagit de faptul ca dupa ~ 28.000 km s-au tocit rau de au ajuns cam la 3 mm. Placute la condus, silentioase, dar nu cele mai aderente. Pilot sport 4 pe aceiasi electrica cu primacy 4. Huruie de te doare capul. Aderenta nu o simt neaparat wow fata de primacy 4. Nu le mai suport si abia astept sa le trec pe iarna, oricum asta fiind ultima incaltare cu ele. Pe o termica am primacy 5, si sunt cele mai ok din experienta mea. Cele mai silentioase si aderente din cele 3. Dupa 20.000 km uzura a scazut cam cu 1 mm. Recomandarea mea e sa alegi primacy 5 fara ezitare.”
“Both our Polestar2 (new) and 2016 Leaf (Jap import) arrived with Primacy 4s on them. The FWD Polestar needed fronts replaced at ~35k km and being 245/45 R19s Primacy were too pricey so went with Kumho Ecsta PS71 equivalents for a lot cheaper and negligible difference in performance. The rears on the Polestar are still going strong at 45k km and look like at least 60k km will be likely. We also fitted Kumhos on our previous Leaf and were very satisfied with performance and life.”
“When I bought my freshly imported 2014 Nissan Leaf in Sept 2020 it had 27,xxx km on the odometer and a full set of Michelin Primacy 4 that were sidewall dated from very late 2018, so likely only very low mileage on them. I put another 47,000km on them before replacing with a full set of Toyo Proxes C100 Plus in April 2024 which have also been great. The Michelin fronts were certainly very worn particularly the shoulders. I really rate Toyos so would encourage you to have a look. I’ve since put 21,000km on the Toyos and even after 12,500km, in May 2025 at their most recent WOF, the fronts still measured at 7mm and rears 8mm. P.S I paid $900 total for the 4 x Toyos inc. fitting, disposal etc.”
Basierend auf 31 Community-Beiträgen
Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Michelin Primacy 4 | B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Premium Touring | Sommerreifen · High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Michelin
Nexen
Sieger: Michelin Primacy 4 — besser bei Handling, Nass und Komfort. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Michelin Primacy 4 erreicht 77 vs 10 bei Handling.
Michelin Primacy 4 erreicht 83 vs 30 bei Nass.
Michelin Primacy 4 erreicht 77 vs 30 bei Komfort.
Michelin Primacy 4 erreicht 87 vs 60 bei Trocken.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.