Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91 — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 81 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 87 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 87 | 82 |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 80 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 81 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 81 | 73 |
Schnee
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 37 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 82 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 77 | 73 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | – | 87 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 72 | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 73 | 55 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 79 | 75 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | – | 80 |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 84 | 71 |
| Trocken | 91 | 82 |
| Nass | 85 | 78 |
| Schnee | 67 | – |
| Komfort | 84 | 52 |
| Geräusch | 92 | 87 |
| Laufleistung | 78 | 57 |
| Handling | 79 | 75 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Vorteile
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Nachteile
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Beobachtungen
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive dry grip and steering feedback, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. However, user consensus is polarized regarding tread longevity, with many owners reporting premature wear, and some experiencing inconsistent performance in wet conditions or issues with sidewall durability.
Vorteile
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Stiff sidewalls provide sharp, responsive steering feedback
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire
Nachteile
- Rapid and premature tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-torque vehicles
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and aquaplaning susceptibility
- Reports of sidewall cracking or deformation after moderate use
- Tendency to tramline or follow road ruts on highway surfaces
Beobachtungen
- Owners of heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW 5-series, performance saloons) frequently report significantly accelerated tread wear.
- BMW and Mini owners transitioning from factory run-flat tires often praise the PS91 for improved comfort and steering feel due to its specific sidewall construction.
- Some users noted that the tire's actual width when inflated can be narrower than the nominal size, leading to fitment or aesthetic concerns.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta PS91 is generally mixed, praising them as a budget-friendly, good-looking max performance summer tire that rivals premium brands in daily driving comfort and appearance. However, multiple users note concerns regarding rapid tread wear, poor heat capacity under track conditions, and susceptibility to degrading under hard abuse compared to dedicated 200 treadwear or extreme performance tires.
“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”
“New meaty tires set up installed, now I can order spacers Went up tire sizes and they definitely fill the gap a bit. First time running sticky kumhos on anytime so excited to see how they turn out.Specs are Kumho Ecsta Ps91 235/40/18 up front and 265/40/18 in the rear. Read more”
“New wheels and tires for my ZHP My old wheels were super beat up and tires were showing wire so I figured I’d upgrade both. Was able to get these freshly powder coated squared set (18/8.5/et 50). Im excited to feel the Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 as they are a budget friendly performance tire. 255/35/18 tires all around”
“275/40 Square Can Fit on a Sedan Shout out to TireRack for having great information on actual tire size. Ecsta PS91 265/40 and ExtremeContact 275/40 has a tread width and section width difference of 0.1” and 0.2” respectively. Tires fit just about perfect. No rubbing so far, and don’t expect it to rub bc of the relatively minimal width change Really goes to show that tire brand matters for fitment Read more”
Basierend auf 16 Community-Beiträgen
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · Extreme Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Hankook
Kumho
Sieger: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — besser bei Komfort, Laufleistung und Trocken. Er liegt in jeder bewerteten Kategorie vorn oder gleichauf.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 erreicht 84 vs 52 bei Komfort.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 erreicht 78 vs 57 bei Laufleistung.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 erreicht 91 vs 82 bei Trocken.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 erreicht 85 vs 78 bei Nass.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.