Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 79 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 85 | 84 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 95% | 99% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 98% | 99% |
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 80 | 80 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 98% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 65% | 91% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 99% | 98% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 96% | 99% |
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 74 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 73 | 80 |
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 92 | 78 |
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 71 | 64 |
| Quelle | Ecsta PS71 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 79 | 77 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 82 | 80 |
| Kategorie | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 79 | 78 |
| Trocken | 81 | 87 |
| Nass | 83 | 84 |
| Komfort | 74 | 85 |
| Geräusch | 92 | 78 |
| Laufleistung | 71 | 64 |
| Handling | 79 | 77 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #1/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 95% #9/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | 99% #6/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -3.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #7/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | -0.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 100% #1/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 84% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +16.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 98% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -0.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 88% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -12.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 98% #7/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 99% #14/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -0.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 69% #6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 89% #1/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -20.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 47% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 100% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -53 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 49% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 53% #19/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -4.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 17% #6/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 25% #4/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -8.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 97% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #2/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | -2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 94% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 95% #2/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | -1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 70% #7/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | -10 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling nass | Subjektiv | 60% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 80% #7/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | -20 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 94% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | -3.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 65% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 91% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -25.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 99% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | +0.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 96% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | -3.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
The Vredestein Ultrac is widely regarded as a comfortable, high-performance touring tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a refined, quiet ride. While many users praise its daily driving capabilities and steering feedback, the tire experiences a significant divide in user experience regarding tread longevity, with reports ranging from exceptional durability to premature, rapid wear.
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Basierend auf 19 Community-Beiträgen
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them. Read more”
“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”
Basierend auf 17 Community-Beiträgen
| Merkmal | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 | B · Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance | Sommerreifen · High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Seitenwand | Blackwall | — |
Kumho
Vredestein
Zu knapp für ein Urteil: Kumho Ecsta PS71 und Vredestein Ultrac liegen insgesamt weniger als 2 Punkte auseinander. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ist stärker bei Geräusch und Laufleistung. Vredestein Ultrac ist stärker bei Komfort und Trocken.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 erreicht 92 vs 78 bei Geräusch.
Vredestein Ultrac erreicht 85 vs 74 bei Komfort.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 erreicht 71 vs 64 bei Laufleistung.
Vredestein Ultrac erreicht 87 vs 81 bei Trocken.
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.
