Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — im Vergleich (September 2026)
Unser Relativer Score kombiniert zu 60 % objektive Testdaten mit zu 40 % Bewertungen von Besitzern — so lassen sich zwei beliebige Reifen vergleichen, auch wenn sie nie im selben Test waren.
Preise ändern sich täglich — prüfen Sie beim Händler Ihre Größe.
TireWheelGuide erhält ggf. eine Provision für Käufe über Links auf dieser Seite.
7 Kategorien im Vergleich
Jeder Balken ist der Relative Score der Kategorie. Klappen Sie eine Kachel auf, um die Testergebnisse und Besitzerbewertungen dahinter zu sehen.
Trocken
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 87 | 83 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 94 | 78 |
| Bremsen trocken (% vom Besten) | 95% | 93% |
| Handling trocken (% vom Besten) | 97% | 99% |
Nass
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 86 | 71 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 90 | 63 |
| Bremsen nass (% vom Besten) | 94% | 84% |
| Bremsen nass – Beton (% vom Besten) | 65% | 67% |
| Kreisbahn nass (% vom Besten) | 98% | 97% |
| Handling nass (% vom Besten) | 100% | 92% |
Schnee
Komfort
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 59 | 42 |
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 82 | 73 |
Geräusch
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professionelle Tests (TWG-Score) | 49 | 57 |
Laufleistung
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack Besitzer | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 74 | 73 |
Handling
Warum dieser Score
| Quelle | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews Besitzer | 88 | 57 |
| DriverReviews Besitzer | 86 | – |
Scores im Überblick
| Kategorie | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relativer Score | 77 | 66 |
| Trocken | 90 | 81 |
| Nass | 88 | 68 |
| Schnee | – | 66 |
| Komfort | 68 | 55 |
| Geräusch | 49 | 57 |
| Laufleistung | 74 | 74 |
| Handling | 88 | 57 |
Höher ist besser. Der Relative Score folgt Ihrer Gewichtung unten; die Kategorie-Scores ändern sich nicht.
Gewichten Sie die Kategorien, die Ihnen wichtig sind
Nässe und Laufleistung starten bei „Wichtig“ — die beiden Punkte, die Käufern am wichtigsten sind. Verschieben Sie die Regler, die Scores aktualisieren sich sofort.
Reifen A
Reifen B
In den Gesamtscore fließen nur Kategorien ein, für die beide Reifen Daten haben.
Die professionellen Testergebnisse hinter den Scores
Jedes Ergebnis ist in % des besten Reifens im jeweiligen Test angegeben. Zeilen „Gleicher Test“ sind der strengste Vergleich: Beide Reifen wurden nebeneinander gemessen.
| Disziplin | Kategorie | Reifen A | Reifen B | Δ | Beide? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aquaplaning quer | Kurve | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | 81% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +19 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen trocken | Trocken | 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 93% #16/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | +1.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling trocken | Trocken | 97% #3/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -2.6 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Rollwiderstand | Effizienz | 88% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -0.3 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kraftstoffverbrauch | Kraftstoff | 97% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -1.8 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Abrieb | Sonstige | 75% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 77% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -2.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Geräusch | Sonstige | 96% #2/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 94% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis | Sonstige | 86% #4/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 50% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +35.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Preis-Leistung | Sonstige | 74% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 58% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | +16.1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Verschleiß | Sonstige | 68% #3/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -4.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtplatzierung | Gesamt | 25% #4/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 7% #14/17 · 2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 | +17.9 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Aquaplaning längs | Geradeaus | 95% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -1.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Komfort | Subjektiv | 90% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +40 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Subj. Handling trocken | Subjektiv | 80% #3/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -15.7 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Gesamtkosten | Gesamt | 0% #8/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #3/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass | Nass | 94% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 84% #29/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | +10.2 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Bremsen nass – Beton | Nass | 65% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 67% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -2.4 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Kreisbahn nass | Nass | 98% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 97% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +1 | Verschiedene Tests |
| Handling nass | Nass | 100% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 92% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +7.5 | Verschiedene Tests |
Vorteile, Nachteile & Beobachtungen
Themen aus Besitzerbewertungen bei Händlern und Bewertungsportalen — nicht die Meinung von TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier ultra-high-performance tire that excels in balancing daily comfort with impressive wet and dry grip. Most users report a significant improvement in handling, noise levels, and ride quality compared to their previous tires, making it a highly competitive and often more affordable alternative to premium rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Vorteile
- Exceptional wet and dry grip with predictable handling at the limit.
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise for a performance-oriented tire.
- Strong value proposition compared to other premium UHP brands.
- Excellent steering responsiveness and feedback.
- Effective rim protection design.
Nachteile
- Rapid tread wear reported by many users, particularly under spirited driving.
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' or floaty feeling during aggressive cornering.
- Some reports of high road noise on rough or non-smooth asphalt surfaces.
- Performance can be inconsistent until the tires reach optimal operating temperature.
Beobachtungen
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 6 consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in tramlining.
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups often report faster-than-expected tread wear on the rear axle.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda MX-5, Suzuki Swift) frequently praise the tire's agility and progressive behavior at the limit.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Vorteile
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Nachteile
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Beobachtungen
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Was echte Besitzer sagen
Aus Reddit, Foren und Bewertungs-Threads. Nicht Teil unseres Scores
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with many drivers praising its balance of performance, wet/dry grip, and pricing compared to direct competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While a few users noted concerns regarding comfort, cold-weather performance in tests, or potential high-speed vibrations, the vast majority recommend them as top-tier daily driving and spirited performance tires.
“215/45 R17 — Primacy 4+ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 for a daily driver My current tyres have developed deep cracks so they need replacing. The annoying part is that half the tyres people recommend simply don't exist in 215/45 R17, which cuts the list down fast. The two that keep coming up are the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but they seem built for completely different drivers. Context: 2024 skoda Fabia 1.5 TSI. I'm not a sporty driver commuting and errands, occasionally push the pedal on an on-ramp, nothing crazy. Hot dry climate with heavy rain in winter and zero snow, so summer tyres only. What I actually want is longevity, comfort and solid wet grip. Quiet would be a bonus. Is the Asymmetric 6 just overkill for how I drive? And is there anything else in this size I should be looking at Read more”
“Goodyear EfficentGrip Performance 2 vs. Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I'm struggling to choose between the two as there is currently a deal on which means the difference in price is only £5 per tyre. I think that means the Asy6 is the no brainer, but my use case doesn't call for a UHP. I value comfort, road noise and resistance to dry cracking over anything else. I don't do many miles. I've already got the Asy6 on the rear axle (came with the wheels) and I'm looking to buy 2 new tyres for the front. I'll need rears at some point probably in the next year. I'd like my car to be more comfortable on broken roads, but I don't think the tyres are the main issue. The car is a Merc C180 estate family car. With 2 young kids, I don't exactly push the car hard. It mostly sits on the motorway or pootles around town. Am I overthinking it? Fronts: 225/45/17 Rears: 245/40/17”
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
Basierend auf 21 Community-Beiträgen
Laufenn S fit EQ
Zu diesem Reifen haben wir noch nicht genug Community-Beiträge gesammelt.
Daten im Vergleich
| Merkmal | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Kategorie | Sommerreifen · Max Performance | Sommerreifen · Ultra High Performance |
| Fahrzeugtyp | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Verfügbare Größen | 98 | — |
| Felgendurchmesser | 17″ – 23″ | — |
| Profiltiefe | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 260 - 300 AA A | — |
| Laufleistungsgarantie | 48.000 km | — |
| Seitenwand | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max. Druck | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Welchen sollten Sie kaufen?
Goodyear
Laufenn
Sieger: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — besser bei Handling, Nass und Komfort. Wählen Sie den Laufenn S fit EQ, wenn Ihnen Geräusch am wichtigsten ist.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 88 vs 57 bei Handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 88 vs 68 bei Nass.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 68 vs 55 bei Komfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 erreicht 90 vs 81 bei Trocken.
Wie vergleichen wir Reifen?
Jeder Kategorie-Score kombiniert zwei unabhängige Signale. 60 % stammen aus professionellen Reifentests (Bremswege, Rundenzeiten, Geräuschmessungen), normiert auf den besten Reifen im jeweiligen Test und mit stärkerer Gewichtung neuerer Tests. 40 % stammen aus Tausenden Besitzerbewertungen von Händlern und Bewertungsportalen. Hat ein Reifen nur eines von beiden, verwenden wir, was vorhanden ist, und weisen darauf hin.
Community-Meinungen aus Reddit und Foren dienen nur als Kontext — sie verändern den Score nie.